The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Procedural keep, this can be immediately relisted. v/r - T P 14:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Archangel class assault ship

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plot only coverage of a fictional aircraft carrier. Additionally, the subject of the articles fails the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in third-party reliable sources on the topic. Anthem 11:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED vehicles and aircraft. Not only is this a viable search term, but it is better to merge content to a list or another article over deleting it. —Farix (t | c) 19:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED, likely search term for the series. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Anthem of joy who initiated this and other Gundam related AfDs has been indefinitely blocked by MuZemike as a sockpuppet of Claritas [1], who was indefinitely blocked after creating a series of disruptive AfDs in the Transformers franchize —Farix (t | c) 17:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Bad faith nom as per above. Jtrainor (talk) 04:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Mobile Suit Gundam SEED: The fictional ship does not meet the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. The content is generated with primary sources and original research by synthesis, so I don't see any value in merging it. I'm not convinced that it is a plausible search term, but I will give it the benefit of the doubt since there is no disambiguation in the article title, so a redirect is acceptable. Jfgslo (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While the article clearly needs improvement, this is a central element of the Gundam franchise, comparable to the Starship Enterprise's importance withing the Star Trek franchise. Edward321 (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.