The result was no consensus for deletion, so keep. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This neologism does not have any reliable sources. While the first AfD for this article was in regards to its notability, I am concerned about verifiability issues. From Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms#Reliable_sources_for_neologisms, "To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers about the term — not books and papers that use the term." HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 19:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]