The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to keep as article's been improved since nomination (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alison Statton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles does not meet notability guidelines. Subject is a musician but does not meet WP:MUSIC, and the tone of the article is promotional and written like a FANPOV. Delta13C (talk) 20:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  23:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  23:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. Obviously notable as the singer with Young Marble Giants and Weekend, and I would guess that Devine & Statton would also have enough coverage for an article. Nomination only addresses article quality with no objective assessment of the subject's notability. A simple Google search finds all these from the first 3 pages of results: , [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Michig (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article has obviously been improved, doesn't read like a promotional piece and sources look good. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.