The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adesh Katariya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the GNG and NACADEMIC. Lacks significant coverage in reliable, third party sources. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – all the sources are documents uploaded to scribd by the article subject. As far as I can find, no academic work has ever cited them. This is the sixth time this article has been created with similar content, in addition to one time as Adesh Gurjar. Kanguole 02:03, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt, wow, this doesn't happen often, absolutely zero library holdings on Worldcat - adesh katariya, books appear to all be selfpublished/print on demand, not necessarily a problem in itself, but have been unable to find any WP:RS, googlesearch brings up twitter, facebook, blogs etc, nothing useable, looks like a case of WP:PROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Zero evidence of notability. Is this BLP a hoax? Xxanthippe (talk) 08:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Deleteas a quick search on Google produced nothing significant. Thelmz (talk) 12:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt as clearly not acceptable for WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF and the sheer number of deletions is enough in that alone. SwisterTwister talk 04:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indicarider (talk • contribs) 20:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC) moved from talkpage[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.