The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:07, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2090 Virus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Prod contested by a third party. Computer virus. The article does not mention anything about it that is special when compared to the dozens or so that are discovered each day. Delete.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Just another virus with no notability like Conficker or whatever the current one is called. §FreeRangeFrog 04:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I found no references outside of forum-like, specialized computer websites. If someone can find a couple reliable news sources mentioning this virus, however, I would say to keep it. Cazort (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - Provides information that might prove useful to users trying to research it. Google results do return a few pages. Alpha 4615 (talk) 20:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Deletion Cancel - 2090 Virus is really existed and I can prove it and its dangerous. and this damaged especially some of korean netizens. and by it, Stock Price of AhnLab Inc (KOSPI) was upwarded because they made vaccine for this dangerous 2090 Virus. If you want to know about this in detail, see below.

1. "Virus 2090 Annoys Korean Computer Users" from Hack in the Box:: Keeping Knowledge Free 2009/02/12
2. "Virus 2090 Annoys Computer Users" from The Korea Times 2009/02/12
3. Information about Trojan.Win32.Crypt.15872.B (so-called 2090 Virus) - HAURI
4. 2090 Virus - Christopher is Awwwesome, a Bigspot blog

• • There are millions of dangerous computer viruses that really exist. That a virus "really exists" is not a criterion for inclusion. That it is dangerous is no criterion either, even if it has the potential to wipe out the entire Internet in a matter of seconds. To have a Wikipedia article about it, a virus has to be notable. According to the Korea Times (which is the only one of the above sources that we deem reliable), the virus only appeared earlier this week, and the cure already exists. Will people remember the virus even three months from now?
    As for removal information, sorry, but Wikipedia must not become a how-to guide. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 11:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.