The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk), DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With 2021 out of the way, it's time to nominate this list ready to (hopefully) add it to the Featured Topic. This time round, I have added DanTheMusicMan2 as a co-nom, as he did the legwork of adding each week's number ones as they were announced. Hope that's OK, Dan! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image review[edit]

Passes my image review, though if you could replace File:191125 Taylor Swift at the 2019 American Music Awards (cropped).png with her any other image, would be better. Licence wise, it is fine (CC licences are non-revocable), but the fact that Cosmopolitan UK changed their video description to make licencing a bit more restrictive looks a bit ... Regardless, we have a lot of images in Commons:Category:Taylor Swift in 2019. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source review[edit]

Passes my source review as well! On first read, I got nothing that could be an issue with the sources. On second read, the only thing I could get was that you can change the link target of Vulture in Ref#6 from [[New York (magazine)|Vulture]] to [[Vulture (magazine)|Vulture]] (a redirect page) just so that if redirects to a particular section. Ref#12 to Ref#113 — all good, as always! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:16, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dank[edit]

Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
Checking the FLC criteria:
1. The prose and the table coding seem fine. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
6. It is stable.
Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 03:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TRM[edit]

I thought we'd gotten into the mindset of linking "chart" in these articles?
"began being published" this seems awkward, could "began publication" or ", published since ..." work?
"number one on the Country Airplay chart, having previously been number one for the chart dated December 19, 2020,[2] while "I Hope" by Gabby Barrett held the number one " -> "number one" used thrice in a single sentence...!
In fact "number one" appears 17 times in the lead, and yes I know it's about number ones, but you could use alternatives to mix it up a little?
"give former American Idol contestant" we sometimes get told which season they were from for context.
I don't seem to be able to access ref 1 without a subscription.

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: - all address, I think. And can I say how good it is to see you back :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, welcome back. - Dank (push to talk) 01:54, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support my primary concerns addressed. And thank you both for your kind words. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by FrB.TG[edit]

"but went back to the peak position" - returned to.
All sources are properly formatted and reliable.

Pretty solid list; just one minor tweak suggestion above. Support either way. FrB.TG (talk) 18:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting.

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the ((featured list candidates)) template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.