Hello, Yasarhossain07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 17:15, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm M.Bitton. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Yevgeny Prigozhin seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! M.Bitton (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. Per Merriam-Webster, an indigenous people are "the earliest known inhabitants of a place and especially of a place that was colonized by a now-dominant group". Thus it is an appropriate term for Māori in mainland New Zealand. The term "mainland" is to differentiate New Zealand from the Chatham Islands, where the Moriori are the indigenous people. Daveosaurus (talk) 05:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
2. (of people) inhabiting or existing in a land from the earliest times or from before the arrival of colonists.
Your recent editing history at Māori people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 07:29, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Māori people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 20:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
References
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Parham wiki (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary to articles, as you did at Gerhard Schröder. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to discuss the article, please use Talk:Gerhard Schröder. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Yasarhossain07, I'm @Nikolaj1905. I have reverted your recent edit to the Veliky Novgorod article. If an uncontroversial statement seems to be unsourced, please add the Citation needed template instead of just deleting the content. Chances are that another Wikipedia editor will provide the source. In this case it was particularly easy, by the way, as the citation was provided in the body of the article. Nikolaj1905 (talk) 08:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Yasarhossaino 7, Pls note that your edit was reverted. Pls note that no ethnicity, heritage, bloodline on the lead section. Pls provide independent, reliable source it indicated he has a Russian citizenship in order to add the info back. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.
TylerBurden (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 23:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
The above warning is regarding your edit here. Pls comment on content and not the editor. Cassiopeia talk 23:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
... discospinster talk 23:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed content and references regarding a contentious topic from Alabuga Special Economic Zone § Shahed-136 drone assembly. Please remember that personal speculation and original research are not adequate reasons to remove factual or supported information. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Primium (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.– Primium (talk) 03:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Yasar,
I agree with you - Wikipedia is systemically biased. I assume that you see systemic bias on Wikipedia as a very serious problem that has serious consequences, or else you wouldn't be taking the time to edit here. I feel the same way. Some of the edits you have made are good, and I think you have the potential to become a competent editor who can really make a positive difference.
The problem is, you are about to be banned, because some of your edits have not been so good, and some of them have not been in accordance with Wikipedia's policies.
There is only one way to have a shot at not being banned, and I am going to tell you what it is. So if you really want to help fix Wikipedia's systemic bias, please read this carefully.
It is essential that you read Wikipedia's policies. Especially WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. There are a few other important ones, but those are the 3 you should start with. Don't just read them. Study them. Read the entire policy, word for word, multiple times, and think carefully about what they mean. Then, look at the talk pages for those policies, and look through the archives, so that you can begin to understand how the policies evolved to their current form, and so that you know what the current debates are about those policies. This might take you days, even weeks or months - but it is essential, and it's worth the effort.
Then, after you have done that, you can resume editing, but you must make sure that all of your edits are compliant with WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and other policies. If another editor tells you that you have violated one of the policies, keep an open mind and remain open to constructive criticism.
You might think to yourself "well, Wikipedia's policies are systemically biased, too, so why should I follow them?" - that's a fair question. The simple answer is: you will be banned if you don't follow the policies. The longer answer is: it's possible that some of Wikipedia's policies are biased, but in order to critique them, you have to understand them first. So, set your criticisms of Wikipedia's policies aside, for now.
The only way you will not be banned is if you do this: publish a comment here that says something like "If you show me the courtesy of not banning me, I will commit myself to studying and understanding Wikipedia's policies before I do any more editing, and I will remain open to constructive criticism from more experienced editors." Don't just copy and paste that, say it in your own words. Then, actually do what I have recommended above.
If you do this, you will probably not be banned. If you don't do this...your Wikipedia editing days are over. It's that simple.
I'm not trying to talk down to you. I am telling you this because I want you to be able to stick around and contribute. Please follow my recommendation so that you do not get banned. Philomathes2357 (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Bajrang Dal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 07:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I see that you disagree with the statement that Rohit Sharma's mother tongue is Telugu. Please could you discuss this on the article talk page: Talk:Rohit Sharma#Mother tongue.
Your edit to the article on Rohit Sharma placed a citation next to a statement that Rohit Sharma's bother is called Vishal Sharma. But you said that the citation was for his mother tongue, so the edit did not make sense and has been reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
You need to contribute to Talk:Rohit Sharma#Mother tongue. If you do not, then your edit concerning Telegu will be reverted by neutral editors.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
His mother tongue has nothing to do with his ability to speak, but on few occassions he do speak Telugu in Hyd. I already mentioned about your non sense in edit summary. His father is Marathi and his mother his Telugu so his mother tongue is what? You can mention his father tongue is Marathi if you wish to. You will be blocked for edit war by Toddy if you continue this non sense. And on top of it you are removing the references, this is vandalism and disruptive editing behavior.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 03:28, 13 July 2024 (UTC)