Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "VALID REALITY", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's promotional and implies shared use.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Mlpearc (powwow) 16:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
The convention on Wikipedia Talk pages is to add new comments to the bottom, not the top, of the page. Your recent comments on Talk:Rebecca Hall have been moved down to the bottom of the page and discussed there: there is no point in continuing to repeat what you have already said at the top. GrindtXX (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You have a new message at Mlpearc's talk page. Mlpearc (powwow) 16:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
I do so have a talk page, User talk:Robert McClenon. Maybe someone at the Help Desk can give you advice on how to post to another user's talk page.
Your comments about Rebecca Hall contradict sourced information. Wikipedia editors should not remove sourced information based on unsourced statements that it is not true. Are you saying that Rebecca Hall is not the daughter of Maria Ewing, or that Maria Ewing was not born in the United States with a mixture of European, African-American, and Native American ancestry? If you have sourced information that states that Rebecca Hall is not the daughter of Maria Ewing, or that Maria Ewing does not have the ancestry that is attributed to her, please provide it. Wikipedia welcomes new information, but only if it is based on reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hall and Ewing both must present irrefutable evidence that they are of American ancestry and the other ancestries they attest to possess. Since they have been incapable of presenting such evidence, likely because such evidence does not exist, they are the caucasians they so obviously are on the outset. Don't sell your entertainment media and your actresses to me over Wikipedia Talk pages. This is not the purpose for Wikipedia and Wikipedia Talk Pages. Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia, as the Wikipedia title states. When you don't have the facts, don't cry and rant about it. Rather, present those facts as Wikipedia asks you to do. --VALID REALITY (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi VALID REALITY! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Video server has been reverted.
Your edit here to Video server was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cl6i9gc7zLA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Laser, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:20, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Laser with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Signing is only done on talk pages, not in articles, such as was done in this edit.[1] Also I would encourage picking a new username. Normal capitalization would help, but more important is picking something that does not look as though it is a company name. See WP:CHU/S. If you need help please let me know. Apteva (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rebecca Hall, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Rebecca Hall. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)