Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Set have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Root (disambiguation). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi - you're changing a lot of articles to make the subject of the article act as the first word of the first sentence. That isn't a requirement - it's often done, but it's not necessary, and sometimes reads awkwardly. Please don't do that. Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 06:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
It is awkward to start the article with the word in, which is ambiguous. What’s your definition of in, in this case of the S-Matrix? Where possible we should try to start the article with the word we are trying to describe or define. It’s a standard convention. Why do you prefer starting all these articles with the word in? UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Without a basic understanding of the S-matrix, you may not properly understand the grammar of the word in, in this case. It would be easier for one to start with the article physics, however that is not a good reason to place physics before the S-matrix. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 06:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
The article you reference states:
If an article's title is a formal or widely accepted name for the subject, display it in bold as early as possible in the first sentence: UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 06:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I would say it is possible and grammatically correct to place S-matrix before in physics UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Give me an example of the edit I made rendering the article grammatically incorrect. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I’m not going to just keep re-editing while you’re reverting but what you’re saying makes no sense. You’re trying to say that standard usage is to not place the article's title as early as possible in the first sentence.
If this is not what you mean what do you assume is standard usage? To place other articles ahead of the bolder article title? If you don’t respond to this I will rêver to S-matrix first. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:18, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Just because I’m fixing multiple articles does not mean that it is incorrect. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, I have started an article on the MOS talk page. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
It’s an improvement for AI spiders on the web UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
And it is also an improvement according to wiki standards in the article you referenced of placing the title as early as possible in the article UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:34, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
I’m going to revert the s-matrix article. Please do not undo it. I want to see if someone other than you has a problem with it and can join the conversation. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 07:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
It is removed because it is redundant and confusing UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please see another example of an advanced opener:
Ra (/rɑː/;[1] Ancient Egyptian: rꜥ or rˤ; also transliterated rˤw /ˈɾiːʕuw/; cuneiform: 𒊑𒀀 ri-a or 𒊑𒅀ri-ia)[2] or Re (/reɪ/; Coptic: ⲣⲏ, Rē)
Let’s see if someone other than you reverts my change to the BRD article by removing the redundant ‘The’ and joins the conversation UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Let’s see if someone else responds to my removal of ‘The’ from the BRD article and joins the conversation UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Ra is a diety
A Ra vs Ra UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You could also start the article:
A Ra, in dieties, is… UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Stop reverting my edits let someone else either revert and join the conversation or leave my edits UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You’re the problem. You’re the only one reverting. Let someone else read it and join the conversation UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 09:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You should be commenting on the MOS lead section talk page where there is a discussion about this, where I am addressing the subject. Please comment there if you want In physics to come before S-Matrix. UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments and suggestions, it has improved my editing! UniversalHumanTransendence (talk) 01:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi UniversalHumanTransendence! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Color, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Light intensity and Hues. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
I had intentionally linked to disambiguating pages because most, if not all, of the topics listed there were, and are likely continuously, relevant to the topic of color. UniversalHumanTranscendence (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Physceptual systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 188.232.146.110 (talk) 03:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Milky Way (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. this edit appears un-constructive. Hemanthah (talk) 07:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Please respond to my comments. At least read the intro paragraph to technological singularity and think, also act in a responsible way as an individual ‘freely’ decisioning. UniversalHumanTranscendence (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)