A tag has been placed on Sullivan Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onorem♠Dil 18:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Anne of Green Gables (1985 film). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anne of Green Gables (1985 film), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Sullivan Productions-related articles. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mschwartz311. Time is running out on this matter. If nobody from the Sullivan company is willing to talk to regular editors, and if you persist in adding promotional material to articles, a general sanction against everyone from your company may be imposed. You are still welcome to join the discussion that is linked above. EdJohnston (talk) 20:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Wind at My Back. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty clear that you have no intention of stopping your promotion of your employer's business, and it's also likely that you and Csheppard1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are either one and the same or working for the same firm to the same ends. The long list of unaddressed issues above says it all. I have blocked you indefinitely for abuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes, and for apparent abuse of multiple accounts. Guy (Help!) 20:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]