Welcome!
Hello, Malc82, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place ((helpme))
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Julius Sahara 17:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Baltimore_pimlico2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I found this site on line
It had a really good table about the entry and exit of Africans during the slave trade. I usually don't bother with net stuff, but the tables are pulled from reputable publishers. I've already used one of the tables to update some of my previus data on African exit points (different coast: senegambia, bight of benin, etc.) Would you mind incorporating the data from its destination points into your section on New World Destinations. I like your graph. I would've made the change myself, but didn't want to step on any toes. hit me back when u can. PEACE :) Scott Free 23:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
No big on the misunderstanding. Hall's numbers should never have been there cuz they only account for North America. I overlooked that before putting it there. My bad. Lovejoy's take into account all of the Americas. I think his numbers would be more appropriate for the overall article. I might take Hall's work to the African-American article where it is more relevant. Thnx for letting me use the table. I'll get right to work on it. And thnx again for keeping me honest. Scott Free 00:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Malc, my comment was intended as sarcasm. If you look at the contributions of Koonoonga, you would see he has been involved in a number of edit wars regarding information/wording of VMI stuff. Always, when pointed to wiki policies, he gets defensive, and sometimes, offensive, complaining that changes that reduce what other editors call peacock terms is due to jealousy and harrassment by "weaker" military colleges. He, and at least other editor have been flagrant about their disregard for wiki policies, if adherence to those policies makes VMI look less important than they (VMI grads) want to make it look.--Vidkun 15:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The Chipping Norton is normally run at Warwick Farm in Sydney. It would be rare, if ever, for a Sydney race to be run in Melbourne. I can't recall this happening, however you might want to check with Super Impose who has provided most of the race histories on Australian races. - Cuddy Wifter 02:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
I beg you to reconsider your nomination of the esteemed Canterbury University of the Seychelles. I have revised the article, with references, to a more balanced description; and argue that it is notable (referred to in a UK broadsheet newspaper article, and a US educational website) and potentially useful, given wikipedia's prominence on google when researching subjects such as CUotS. The article is now on my watch-list. --Tagishsimon (talk)
I responded to your question at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of webcasters. Hope that clears it up for yo. --Whsitchy 23:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for fiding a more appropriate map. Peterkingiron 21:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I am from Canada. Kingjeff 15:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
It's just another false assumption from an Easterner. Kingjeff 15:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for your question, I answered on my talk page but I can repeat the answer in short here. No, my comment was in no way inteded at your posts, it just happens to come after it. It's only directed at the nominator. Have a nice day! JdeJ 16:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you were involved in the discussion for merging the West German soccer team. I have put a voting section here. Kingjeff 14:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I am new and I forgot that talk pages were for discussing the article not the topic. I hope what you told me will help me in the future. R d the savior 21:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Whois is a program that repots to whom an IP address belongs. The Wikipedia article, that is under the link, explains much more detail. But it is a useful tool for discovering somthing about who is editing the pages when instead of creating an account they use an IP address. All I have done is put the output of the whois program onto the talk page of an IP address so that someone can see to whom it belongs. As this information is applicable to all users of that IP address I think it should be at the top of the talk page. I did this because of the history of recent edits from User:89.102.140.194 address which is far more than a causual passing editor would normally do. --Philip Baird Shearer 21:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi Malk82,
Looks like we both stuck our noses into that at around the same time; I type slow. I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but the comment you left on WikiDragon's talk page was essentially taunting him. I share your lack of enthusiasm for organized religion, but that comment doesn't do anybody any good. At best, he ignores it. At worse, he feels persecuted and starts acting accordingly. Just my 2 cents. --barneca (talk) 22:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I actually found it a bit humorous.
¥→WikiDragon295 04:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Trust me, he knewn about the reason on his talkpage, and he deleted it, and he told me. And I had permission from him to edit his page.Proove of my reason on hi's talkpage
This following is a copy from the user's talkpage history.
§→Nikro 10:55, 9 June 2007(UTC)
You participated in the AfD for Kari Schull where the nominator is attempting to overturn the "keep" decision at [deletion review Kari Schull]. This discussion is linked to 3 others the previous day, where the author of the articles is attempting to use the "keep" at Kari Schull to overturn the rejection of his other similar articles. Interesting potential precedents for the applicatrion of BIO, or for the reform of special case notability criteria --Kevin Murray 18:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Mr.wang (including his previous account Gordomono) has duplicated List of U.S. and Canadian cities by number of major professional sports franchises at least twice because he can't get consensus to add the leagues he wants to it. The leagues he wants to add were there for a while and made that page a nasty mess; I did a complete rewrite about 3 months ago with a WP:BRD that stuck and have been watching it pretty hard since. Some other users were able to make a decent case for partial inclusion of the CFL and MLS, and so they got in; he doesn't like the guidelines as discussed, though, so he keeps forking the data, and I keep flipping his new pages to redirects as I find them. I've left two messages now asking him to stop this with no response. If you're willing to help me watch him, I'd appreciate it. VT hawkeyetalk to me 03:19, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
I removed the category. With userboxes there is often somewhere in they're code something like [[Category:Something]] so that any one that adds it to their page are placed in a category.Aiden Fisher 08:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
The Germany national football team and the U-21 team might be merged. I've already started a discussion and vote for this. You can join the discussion here. Kingjeff 16:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar. I am pleased to say that I am gradually recovering from the ordeal! Regards. - Cuddy Wifter 22:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
about this? --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Can you improve/edit/update this newly created article please? Sports in Saskatchewan I see you have edited many a SK sports article esp Marquis Downs horse racing venue. TXS SriMesh | talk 06:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention to the problem with the bird's eye images on the Holley Central page. DJVaccar has been a nuisance under the name User_talk:DJvac as well (it seems without a doubt). I suggest we push to report him to WP:AN/I and possibly WP:3RR. Sinisterminister 18:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Frolunda logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hollywoodpark.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hollywoodpark.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Valparaiso sporting club.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logosanisi.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logosanisi.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I declined the speedy on Michael La Hood, Jr. because I think it should e debated in public, and I invite you to take it to AfD. I have explained my reasons on the talk page; I do not mean to imply that the speedy was incorrect, that your arguments are wrong, or that the article is notable, just that a community page is the place for the discussion. DGG (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Somehow we seem to have got back to the old map pointing at New England, not Europe. Can you manage to get the other map back? I think we may have to accept that the New England version stays as well, otherwise some one will insist on changing back again. It is not my habit to watch other people's talk page: I suggest this conversation should continue on the article talk page, if necessary. Do you know how to get the page protected against alteration by those not logged in? It is one of a small number that I watch that suffers continual vandalism. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Club Hipico Santiago logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hallo, ich habe gesehen dass du am Dresden-Artikel beteiligst bist und selber Dresdner bist.
Mir ist nicht klar, wo deine Position ist, aber mich ärgert es maßlos dass man in diesem Artikel Dinge über Dresden schreibt, die einfach nicht stimmen. Und mich würde interessieren wie du dazu stehst. Mich ärgert es maßlos, dass die Alliierten nicht zugeben dass auch sie Verbrechen begangen hatten, und z.b. in diesem Artikel Dresden so darstellen als sei Dresden "Militärstadt" gewesen. Dresden hat natürlich Kasernen etc. gehabt, aber es ist bekannt dass dies nicht Dresdens Hauptfunktion war. Wie dem auch sei, mich würde interessieren ob du es in Ordnung findest, dass meine Beiträge zu Dresden ständig verändert werden. Militärziele, wurden eindeutig in der Innenstadt nicht bombardiert, weil es dort keine gab. Flughafen, Albertstadt etc. lagen ja weit draussen vor der Innenstadt, und es war ja auch offizielles Ziel gewesen, den Willen der Bevölkerung durch "moral bombing" zu brechen. Was nachweislich nicht funktionierte.
besten Gruss
Peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterBln (talk • contribs) 17:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Woodbine logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo chc.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
You've uploaded File:Santaanitalogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this article? It seems to have had substantial edits from people without a broad enough knowledge of the subject. I am not sure my depth of knowledge is enough to put it back to an acceptable state, without the loss of good recent additions. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Malc82! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Victorian architecture, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 01:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
There is currently an issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thoroughbred racing that as a member you might wish to read and vote on. Handicapper (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Valparaiso sporting club.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Malc82,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Malc82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)