The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Maren.Lack (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maren.Lack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, La1228, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the subject of Media psychology would be a great topic to expand. It pertains to a historical change in behavior. Austin H 21:10, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

I like that idea too! I think we would be able to find a lot of information on the topic because it is relevant to most people today and researchers. La1228 (talk) 21:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that Media psychology is an interesting topic and I also think there will be a lot of reliable resources to investigate. KateKlos (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay let's plan on our first choice being Media Psychology! It is an interesting topic. La1228 (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a lot of the history of Media Psychology is just fixing spelling errors and putting in headings. They seem like a lot of edits, but small edits were made, no big ones. La1228 (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as if this article has been edited since 2013. It still has a lot content to fill. Austin H 21:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm glad it's kind of empty because it gives us a lot of room to work! La1228 (talk) 21:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! I really like that there is little information on this topic. We can give it a push into the right direction so others can learn about this interesting part of psychology. KateKlos (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another topic that I think is neat is the Society of Experimental Social Psychology. It caught my eye because I'm taking Experimental Social Psychology and I could get some information in class about the topic along with getting extra help or insight from my teacher. KateKlos (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article has very few edits considering its age. There is a lot of good information on this subject. I like.Austin H 21:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austinharles (talk • contribs)

That's really nice that you would be able to use your text book to help. Also the notes you take in class can help guide us if we decide to do this topic! La1228 (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the article has a good starting point too. It can give us some guidance on what needs to be filled. Plus there is a ton of concepts and psychologists that have contributed to this branch of psychology. KateKlos (talk) 01:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Group 14, Both media psychology and SESP are very good topics. Unfortunately, your first choice, media psychology, was taken by another group. That's okay. SESP is an important organization with a long history. The current article is definitely a stub, and you will find plenty of material to expand it to a real article. It also has the advantage of being a society that exists and is active. I'm sure if you contact them, you will find them very helpful. I can't swear to it, but I think at least one of our faculty at NDSU is a member of SESP. I'll check on this for you. J.R. Council (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Society of Experimental Social Psychology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Annual, Conference and Venues. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]