This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
With your permission, I'd like to extend this block indefinitely; that caliber of personal insult is something I don't take very lightly. Of course, it's up to you. m.o.p 06:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 20:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
It's interesting to note that WP:COPYRIGHTS makes no specific mention that covers users' translations of copyrighted material. I suppose this comes under derivative works, but it would be helpful if there were a clear mention of it. FWIW, as a professional translator, translation contracts are handled on a one-by-one basis. They can include a copyright for the translator, or no copyright for the translator. It often depends on expected sales of the translated work, or on a one-off fee for the translation. Sometimes I get copyright royalties on the sales in addition to the fee for the translation. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Dear Danger
That User you blocked yesrtday, it says a week on his contributions page but a template says a month on his talk page. What is it Really? --Mr. Curious Man 9:56, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Please delete the redirection page Outline of video games, which I created, to make way for a page move. Thank you. The Transhumanist 15:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Please delete the redirection page Outline of actuarial science to make way for a page move. Thank you. The Transhumanist 15:10, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
In two days, do whatever you want, I'll be gone. Let me have my swan song. It's certainly not hurting the project, as I'm not editing anymore. Seriously, I don't know you, but you've got better things to do than to patrol a page of a user that's probably not going to be alive in a couple of days. And come on, protecting FT2 is kind of ironic, don't you think? OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 07:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm gearing up to redesign my userpage, and I need to look over the pages from my original user account. I have my original summary of contributions in there, previous user page design, old projects I'd like to review, etc.
The account name is User:Go for it!. I need all its pages undeleted.
If it's not too much trouble, that is.
I come to you because I know the job will get done right.
Sincerely, The Transhumanist 21:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm still searching. Please undelete User:The Transhumanist/Sandbox5. Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:43, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Please undelete User:The Transhumanist/Workshop/Sandbox5 and User:The Transhumanist/Workshop2. And do I have any other deleted ones on this account? If so, please undelete them. I still haven't found what I'm looking for. The Transhumanist 00:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
How come the 2 links above are still red?
Concerning your searching question, I studied this stuff when I was an admin coach. (Though I've never been an admin).
See Wikipedia:Viewing and restoring deleted pages.
The relevant info is:
That last method, when used on a username should show you all deleted subpages. Let me know if it works! The Transhumanist 03:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Restored the following:
I only restored pages with significant content and didn't restore old drafts. I'll go through more later today. Is any of this helpful? Danger (talk) 16:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
I hope that at least some of this is useful; I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for. Danger (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Cla68 (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I think the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sounak_Mukhopadhyay is now properly modified and cleaned-up as per your reccomendation. Please have a look on it. Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the watchful eye! 28bytes (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar! I shall treasure it always, and channel its energy when I get stuck with how to resolve a dispute. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 12:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Richard Stengel. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
why and under what authority have you to delete a user page of mine which is there for the purpose of preparation and not public? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiscotheque (talk • contribs) 07:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello - I am puzzled by a message on my watchlist re: the deletion of this file by you:
(Deletion log); 08:57 . . Danger (talk | contribs) deleted "File:The Hermitage Quarry.jpg" (F2: Corrupt or empty file, or a file description page for a file on Commons)
I used the photo for the page Ditton, Kent. It appears to have been marked for speedy deletion by User:Marcus Qwertyus but there was no notice and the photo has not been deleted despite the above message.
There is nothing wrong with the photo as far as I can see. Thanks Shaibalahmar (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Seems a somewhat punitive deletion of that particular page. Griordan (talk) 08:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
It does not seem too fair to remove my whole work in less than 2 hours of it being moved. I would not be so annoyed it i got a real reason, well one better than "blatant hoax or misinformation" as i was writing about some who may not be what you define to be famous does not mean that people will not want to read about him or that it's a hoax, how is it a hoax? i simply do not agree. I'm Lovin' TiT (talk) 19:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
right danger you are getting on my bad side, the reason the book covers look shopped is because they are but if you did some homework you would see that most publishers use Adobe Photoshop for designing covers. The company SSPC does exist, just because there is no Wiki for it does not mean its not real. Check out some copyright lists for germany you damn fool. This is simply you last chance to cease and desist, this is my new wiki and i don't want it destroyed by the likes of you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imlovintit (talk • contribs) 04:55, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
I have mistakenly uploaded this image, could you or any other administrator please delete it as soon as you can. Thanks. GWPSPØ9Ø7thAdv. 08:17, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
So - I've been noticing something, and thought I'd get an uninvolved party to take a look at things... lately, I've noticed Iniced popping up on a lot of pages that I've edited - this editor isn't wikihounding me, per se, but there does seem to be a clear case this this editor is following my edits - he's either harassing other editors, such as this edit earlier today, or injecting himself into conversations/disputes he has no bearing in, such as this one, or other edit conflicts - in fact, he did this enough that at one point someone opened a sockpuppet investigation about me because of his intrusion. This has been going on for about a month - the account was created soon after I'd dealt with some problem IPs, namely 81.159.234.191 (whose edit summaries are written in the same fractured style as Iniced) and 81.153.143.227. I'm not really sure what can be done - like I said, it's not really harassment, but it's just weird. Any thoughts? MikeWazowski (talk) 20:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Please undelete the Monster High Webisodes page. I accidentally published it when I only wanted to see a preview when creating the page when it was marked for Speedy Deletion. I had just finished adding all current webisode information with references to the official website and official Youtube channel just before it was deleted. Majonopersona (talk) 05:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello Adopter :) hope you are well...
Just wanted to say hello and ask a quick question (also to tell you that I got Augmentative and alternative communication to 'Good Article' status, which I'm proud of and wouldn't have managed without your support) - I wanted to ask a quick dump question about achiving topics on a talkpage - would it be reasonable to archive, say, the topics on Talk:Augmentative and alternative communication that haven't been touched since 2009, or should they stay for the time being? Failedwizard (talk) 08:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Danger, I hope it's been one of your better days. (I hope you feel well).
I was wondering today, same as everyday, how to improve my favorite article. :) On some other page, I had done an edit here which was reverted immediately here on a page that has a military or big business funded tag-team working it. (check the talk-page or edit summary, wow). Lolz, I was thinking as most of earths population do, maybe it's best to leave those sort of people alone. Anyhow, I got to thinking, as I always do, that the ISS pages are not beyond improvement, and considering the warring that goes on there, and that it's all done by ordinary people, a solution to most every problem is possible. After all, it's just a space station.
There are plenty of areas to improve, small facts, large facts, small editor problems, medium and large editor problems. I was thinking one that is not big at all, and is solveable pretty easily, plus you could help me with, as my ideas aren't too flash, is the ENG:VAR's effect upon many other editors. Not something I've ever cared about (although I secretly think hillbilly or maybe cockney slang would be cool variants to use, lol, but impractical for widespread appeal and stability). I was thinking to use google to look into wikipedia's discussion areas to find people who have experience in those matters, and could offer better guidance than I can, to other editors. It may seem calm on the surface, but, as one of my critics put it, it's a 'timebomb' or some such, can't recall, but you just have to scratch the surface and it springs up on anyone, a perfect bear-trap waiting for a new editor to step on, and have their enthusiasm for editing amputated at the ANI hospital clinic, lolz.. Well, rather than looking into google, I'm wondering do you know where I can look for experts ? Naturally, the usual eng:var pages, I've read, many many times.
Apart from that, on matters that I don't need help with, but feel free to comment on, as you're mentoring me(so it's kind of just a news update sort of thing), I've tided up my talkpage setting up mizabot instructions, put up the first of the barnstars I'll make, apologized in a big way to colds7ream on his talkpage, man can I apologize, and started secretly plotting a new project (harmless, just exciting is all) in email. Overall, I'm too cynical at the moment to try putting up a very useful list of improvements to the ISS page for it's FAR. Nobody else cares, they're all 'Beyond FA thar bee see mawnsters' and just wouldn't be capable of bursting the bubble they are in. Penyulap talk 14:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Nick here. Since we last corresponded I've done a lot, fun, sucky and in-between: from creating articles and one unsuccessful WikiStrategy proposal, to tangling with a nationalistic POV warrior who finally merited indef blocking and the damage he's done. But I thought you might be interested especially by my latest: brainstorming on how we can include voices of marginalized people more (such as people with disabilities) using wiki-citation of oral histories. User_talk:NickDupree#More_Oral_Citations :) NickDupree (talk) 01:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
The Modest Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Danger for copy editing articles totalling over 4000 words in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2011 backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating! --Slon02 (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC) |
Hello Danger... Let me tell you that it is very difficult to find anything at Wiki... click here click there... and you have to read pages of stuff... and more clicks... more stuff... wow... but finally I'm glad I can communicate with you. I was shocked when I first read the page... how can someone take credit for something they did not do... Oh well... that's nothing new... As for the Hawaiian Punch page I will correct the promotional stuff. All the people that I mentioned in my edit page have left the Planet but I have a lot of friends that worked with me at John Urie and Associates that are still around... do you need confirmation from those Urie people ??? There's Jack Heiter, animation director, Bob Cutis, producer at Film Roman (Garfield) Don Reidel, editor and many more. Please let me know what's next...
Here's an email that my friend Jack Heiter sent to Jerry Beck of Cartoon Brew... Hi Jerry, According to Wikipidia The Hawaiian Punch character "Punchy" and commercial was designed by Joe Malerba and animated by Jan Svochak. I was at John Uries Studio at the time the commercial was made in late 1961 and I don't know either of these guys. As I remember Bob Guidi and John Urie designed the character and Jean Guy Jacques directed it and Rod Scribner was the animator. I believe it won an art directors award/awards under the banner of John Urie and Associates and was a very successful commercial that John and Jean Guy Produced for many years later. Jan Svochak may have worked on it at one time or another but as far as I know he wasn't involved in the beginning. I can't find anything on Joe Malerba. Jack Heiter.
Dear Jean Guy and Don... (from Jack Heiter) According to my research J.J. Sedelmaier Productions weren't even in business in 1962 when John Urie produced "Punchy", they began their studio in New York in 1990: J. J. Sedelmaier Productions, Inc. is a design and animation studio started by J. J. Sedelmaier and Patrice Sedelmaier in 1990. It produces both print campaigns and animated films in a variety of styles and techniques. The company's talents are also contracted for creative consultation and speaking presentations.
Here is a link to Cartoon Brew for Jan Svochak: http://www.cartoonbrew.com/old-brew/jan-svochak-1926-2006.html
from Buzz Potamkin: I was very saddened to read of Jan’s passing; he was truly a prince among animators. It was more than 30 years ago when I first brought Jan to Perpetual, at the time BBDO took over the Hawaiian Punch account and brought Punchy back to life. (this would put Jan Svochak on the job in the nineties???)
PS. I have a photograph of Peggy Moffitt with her late husband William Claxton. I made a film with them. Potenski (talk) 16:10, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Re: "You have made three reverts on Republic P-47 Thunderbolt within the last 24 hours. If you revert again by adding the final sentence of the current lead again, you may be blocked without further warning. Danger (talk) 12:47 pm, Today (UTC−5)
Anyway, no problem with that,,, but the same article was created in the Arabic Wikipedia about Suleiman Obeid (http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF) and it has been deleted by the Arabic Wikipedia's admins,, just a few hours ago,, which mean that the person isn't a famous at all. Thanks Sean (talk) 00:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Danger,
i work on an article on Hindley-Milner Type Inference and might later use some help by a more experienced Wikipedia author. While i believe the article will be OK from point of content, it might not come out in proper Wikipedia style, so to say, for my lack of experience. Its my first Wikipedia article. Since you're the only adopter listed with theoretical CS interests, i write to you, though my questions are not technical, really. The article is not ready yet, and perhaps not worth a closer look, as I've to finish it first and will almost certainly rewrite it along the way. Never the less, i thought it might be a good idea to look for a mentor to ask about balancing of the article, whether to split it etc, early. Thus if you have time and like the topic i would be pleased if you could help in a bit, otherwise, since you know the folks here better, if you could suggest me another one to ask.
(As a note aside, I found you're preference regarding singular "they", which is the common German honorific form when talking to each other, but after reading the related article about this form in English it appears to be only in use today when talking about a third person. I hope they feel not to be addressed too familiar otherwise. ;^)
Kind regards --Cobalt pen (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Re: Edmond Halley. You could've left that 24 hours or so, surely? TNUK (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Danger-
Thanks for objecting to the speedy deletion of my entry for Verified Audit Circulation, which is one of the most prominent companies in circulation auditing.
FYI, I have made some changes to the wording of the entry that will hopefully make its reasons for notability more apparent.
I am fairly new to Wikipedia, so this is the first time that I have had an article named for speedy deletion, and I'm hoping that you would clarify some things about this process.
On my user page, I can still see the blurb that the entry is slated for speedy deletion, but I don't see any longer the notice that speedy deletion has been contested.
Does that mean this article is at risk for speedy deletion still?
Also, when I go to the article itself, I don't see any kind of messages at the head of the article talking about prospective deletion/objection to deletion. Does a speedy deletion blurb not appear with the article itself, or is this a sign that speedy deletion is no longer at issue?
I appreciate any information you can provide--and your support for the entry on Verified Audit Circulation.
Thanks again.
Seandalytx (talk) 16:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)seandalytx
Hello, Danger … Since Gorak anush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been delete three times this month (and twice as Anush gorak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)), and the author can't seem to take the hint, would you please WP:SALT it? Thnx. Happy Editing! — 71.166.154.41 (talk · contribs) 17:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello Danger! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Parent,
If you get a spare min, would you have a peer over my shoulder at [Talk:Optical_Express] it was a COI and I've got involved to try and mediate: I could do with someone checking I'm not being an ass :( Failedwizard (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome, I have been a long time reader of wikipedia articles and I finally decided to join with a username of my own. So are you saying that if I simply place this: (~~~~) at the end of a message in a discussion that it would automatically sign my name so that I don't have to continuously go through the whole process of having to type it all? I'm going to try it here. Bastian (talk) 19:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Be aware that User:Arthur Rubin / Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin (Arthur Rubin) hides/deletes other's Talk, such as May 19th on User Talk:Zodon http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zodon&diff=429845197&oldid=429841834 ... on March 30th 2011 it was User talk:Granitethighs http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Granitethighs&diff=prev&oldid=421531277 and User talk:OhanaUnited http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OhanaUnited&diff=421531280&oldid=421528249 These are related to Template:Sustainability and Sustainability (and related topics). Not the only cases of recidivism by Art. 99.35.13.81 (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Also I've been knocked off-line, DDOS? 99.35.13.81 (talk) 02:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
You speedy deleted Genius inc.. It has been recreated, perhaps you could delete it again as the new article is identical? --Biker Biker (talk) 08:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello! If've noticed you had changed the position of <ref> in the preabula of aequorid article. In russian typography they strongly recommend to put footnote-mark before most of punctuation marks: commas, dots, colons, semicolons, etc. I'm aware that the European tradition differs in some aspects but the footnote-mark placed after a dot looks stange. Are you sure it should be like this? Mithril (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
I've added some data to the article (largerly concerned with polyps). Could you please look through it? Apprehensibility of the text is of particular interest. Mithril (talk) 13:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Please go to Portal:Contents/Outlines' and fill in as many missing annotations as you can, even if it's only one or two. Every little bit helps!
The annotating of the entries on Portal:Contents/Outlines is nearing completion.
Annotated entries look like this:
Entries needing annotations look like this:
Even if all you can do is one or two, the support will be greatly felt. Many hands make light work.
Thank you. The Transhumanist 00:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
You asked user:Deutkar ulhas if the user understood the issue about copyright violation. It appears that the user does not as I just reverted another. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't know. Spidey665 15:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refer my talkpage, I have been unjustly blocked since I am on a shared network. I have added the template for unblock, please oblige.
Jobin (talk) 08:51, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Danger, could you take a look at this block from earlier today? You blocked for a username violation (and hardblocked), but cited vandalism as well. I see three edits, none deleted, and the first of those was an article proposal (albiet a misplaced one) that doesn't seem to be disruptive. The other two are unblock requests. The username issue is one thing, and can be reviewed on the merits, but could you doublecheck the vandalism side of it? Thanks much, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Our friend at Gridplusplus (talk · contribs), later 84.44.48.3 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), now appears to be editing from DerAbt (talk · contribs). Compare ip edit and DerAbt edit. Sockpuppeting. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Howdy howdy. Your block of Gunesh10 (talk · contribs) placed an autoblock what appears to be a heavily used IP. I've removed it (the autoblock only) and closed unblock requests from 110808049 nisarg (talk · contribs), B.suhasini (talk · contribs), Akshaybade (talk · contribs), Jobin RV (talk · contribs), Pankaj marghade (talk · contribs) and Vaibhav1992 (talk · contribs). I performed a fairly cursory scan to make sure none of them are the same user; it seems like there is a class doing a project? Anyways, I left the list there in case you want to check them yourself or re-activate the autoblock if I've made a mistake. Kuru (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
You want to expand on the template you left on my page? I can point out the copyright violation in more detail if you couldn't put it together with the duplicate report. OlYellerTalktome 03:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Danger, I wanted to know why you restored my edited article by the name Data Flow Diagram to previous. I have not done any type of copyvio and you can check it. I have uploaded images of my personal work only. Also I have posted all the original content into my article. So please re-restore my article or gie me reason asap. Thank you.--Unmeshsphalak (talk) 13:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)User:Unmeshsphalak.
Hey Danger. I saw you restored what you had previously removed from the text. I too cannot find the copyvio in the text you removed. I had assumed that you had pulled out the copyvio parts. The copyvio can be found with this duplicate report. It's hard to spot because they've done some crafty word changing like "2-way" to "two way" or "can be tracked" to "are traced" that doesn't show up in the duplicator unless you're reading between the bolds. Do you mind taking a closer look? I can do a section by section analysis but as Unmeshsphalak has been reverted several times for adding blatantly copyrighted material, I'd rather not spend a significant amount of time putting a report together for something that I, no offense, think is very obvious. OlYellerTalktome 14:47, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi We have to accept that the CEOs of large engineering conglomerates have probably never dirtied their hands on a lathe or a turret drill. I've also worked alongside many highly salaried NGO organisers who rely on donations and voluntary work. Here in Laos and Cambodia, we've had to tear down schools they have constructed and rebuild them. Anyway, FWIW, I'm just letting you know that I've had enough of this IEP issue. Deleted pages are still being recreated, or undeleted by their admins, but I'm now skipping all India related new pages while I'm on patrol - I have to get back to development of the new 'new user' interface and new page patrol systems that I've committed myself to helping the WMF on - as a voluntary factory worker ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate the withdrawal and close for Umbrage (film). Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ruhollah Khomeini. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Danger, in looking through User:Penyulap's pages, it seems like you had at some point adopted/agreed to mentor him. Right now there is a discussion on going at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Penyulap_and_disruption_at_Talk:Tooth_fairy concerning some of his recent behavior. Is there any insight you can give? Thanks, only (talk) 22:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to invite you Danger, to comment here if you have time. Penyulap talk 01:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)