|
|
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Dear Britlawyer:
No, I did not know this Portal. Thank you by invite me to share it.
Thanks my friend
--Gustavo 04:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear friend:
This is just a wish of happiness in this Easter from myself. (The Easter Egg is a kindly gift from Tomek)
Regards
--Gustavo 05:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
No problem! Always a please to expand a page :) Mumby 21:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Britlawyer:
I world be proud to work with you in the “Anders Army” work, but I am translating the article about “Szlachta” to Spanish right now and also I am classifying Coats of arms in Commons (This is a boring and long task to do)
Anyway, I hope we can do something together in a near future.
Your friend. --Gustavo 03:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Could you give some references about the interpretations of the Montevideo convention (you wrote you could)? Regards. Alaexis 04:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
I have now answered on the page and provided two initial sources. Should it be required, the list of sources can easily be increased tenfold. This is entry level material so the matter is easily settled. With regards to individual inclusions, however, it would be appropriate to find individual sources for each state or state-like entity. Britlawyer 23:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Until you don’t present any support (Primary and secondary sources) which support your claims (which are obvious POV), you can not simply rv the article. If you are lawyer as you claim to be, you should know better about presenting support and evidence for the claim which is highly disputed. No references and sources, your claims are just empty words and your rv are just another step of POV pushing. Ldingley 15:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Please see [1] I have no opinion on individual entities, and I support your inclusion of the "dubious / neutrality contested" tag on each of those until such time they are either removed or the requested sources are provided. Until then it is preferable that the list criteria remains consistent with international law.Britlawyer 15:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to come over and thank you for bringing some sanity and knowledge to the discussion at Talk:List of sovereign states. That place is a morass of POV pushing, ignorance, and special pleading. I don't even really care if South Ossetia and what not are listed, but the apparent desire of several people to get a perfectly useful page entirely in order to prevent those places from being listed is outrageous. Keep up the good work. john k 15:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
After reviewing your contributions, I found that it is extremely likely you are a block-evading sockpuppet of User:William Mauco. I am aware that a checkuser request the other day came up negative, but negative checkuser results are not compelling negative proof and we have indeed seen other false negatives in related cases lately. I therefore feel justified in blocking you on the grounds of similarity of behaviour and editing profile. You were certainly not a new user when you started contributing a few weeks ago. You said you had previous anonymous IP contributions from November. You can be unblocked if you provide a plausible explanation of your earlier history including disclosure of those IP contributions (you can do so confidentially and in private to me.)
This block will be advertised to the ongoing Arbcom case at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Transnistria/Evidence and is subject to review by the arbitrators. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)