See Wikipedia:Link rot. In addition, that particular citation was not just a bare url, but had issue number, month and year, and is available as a print edition. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 03:04, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
No matter, it's from a source called "armenianweekly" anyway, that's just not neutral. And not an independent source. It's a pro armenian source.. The enitre article is actually poorly sourced. @Tiptoethrutheminefield BM Tornado (talk) 08:31, 21 August 2016 (UTC)