The Original Barnstar | ||
What a fantastic article at Building of the World Trade Center! — Rebelguys2 talk 02:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC) |
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Further to this, any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, "impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to the events of September 11, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process." The full remedy is located here.
For the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 15:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Aude,
I visited your talkpage to discuss about our 9/11 article. I'm so disappointed after reading this. Tendentious editors are not easy dealt with, but if sane people like you leave WP, most of our articles will be ruined by idiots. You are certainly one of the best WP editors. We have to bring 9/11 article to FA someday. Please don't leave WP. Best wishes, AdjustShift (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
You wrote a Signpost article that included this new magic word, but it doesn't appear to have been enabled yet. Do you know when we can use it and if it could potentially be used in templates to display the last user who edited an article on another page? - Mgm|(talk) 11:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you take another look at your comments there? Raul654 (talk) 21:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I recently set up my account with Twinkle. My account is fairly old and I have many many edits to my name. When I want to use the Twinkle application I still get a message saying my account is to new to use Twinkle. I was wondering if you know what I can do to fix this. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks.--gordonrox24 (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey Aude, just thought you might like to know that another user is attempting to get yet another mediation case going on the Sept 11th article. Normally I'd let it alone and not bother you, but since you were named outright, I thought you should know.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-03/September_11_attacks
--Tarage (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I recently made some minor edits to the article on Mohamed Atta. While doing so I came across a template I had never noticed before, the ((dubious)) template.
I left a note on Talk:Mohamed_Atta#Dubious, where I noted that who-ever placed these templates did not comply with the guidelines direction that they should first explain the concern that prompted the tag on the article's talk page.
It took me a long time to figure out who had placed these templates. The edit summaries were no help, as they didn't state who added these tags in any of your edit summaries. If I am not mistaken It was you -- you placed these tags.
I tried to keep my note on the article's talk page non-confrontational. I didn't name you as the person who left the tags. And I wrote that the guideline might not have been so clear on the responsibilities of the tag placer eight months ago, when the tags were first placed.
Since writing that I checked the revision history of Wikipedia:Disputed statement. It seems to have had only trivial modifications during the last eight months.
Have you made heavy use of the ((dubious)) template? If so, did you add explanations to the article's talk pages in the other instances you used it?
If you decide that the simplest way to bring your use of this template into compliance with the guideline is to simply excise all the instances where you used it, and didn't explain yourself, I am prepared to help. Geo Swan (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Al-Qaeda involvement in Asia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PamD (talk) 09:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier... a special report about the developers meeting would be wonderful. If you want to do it for this week, I'm happy to delay publication until near the end of 6 April UTC, if necessary. Otherwise, it could go for next week.--ragesoss (talk) 02:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if there had been any discussion as to whether or not to hold it in May (Or maybe June?). Since you were the one who announced that the pizzeria had been reserved, I am assuming that you might be aware of any conversations that are taking place in that regard.
Wishing you well,
--NBahn (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. And, I hope you do come back to Commons. I'm disappointed about what happened to you, but your help is needed there. --Aude (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Please be advised that a proposed Meetup/DC 7 is being discussed here. WE need your help to figure out some of the details! You are being sent this notice because you previously expressed interest in such meetups. If you no longer wish to receive such notices, then please leave your user name here.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Since the first FA nomination I re-took several pictures. Is there anything else I should do before re-nominating it for featured article status? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
You might want to put in a Wikipedia:Geonotice for the upcoming DC meetup. The tool is governed by MediaWiki:Geonotice.js, and given that you're a programmer you would probably understand the coding much better than me anyway, and can set it to cover whatever region you prefer. Or if there's some problem, I can do it for you also.--Pharos (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I am curious as to why you remove the dablink to the 9/11 wikiproject in this edit.Smallman12q (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, hopefully you are ware by now but if not, this sort of thing [1] ([2]) is WP:OR and not acceptable in wikipedia Nil Einne (talk) 10:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Do you still want to handle this ticket, or have someone else take it? Please reply on my talk page. -- Jeandré, 2009-05-14t12:28z
The record shows you deleted the article on Jason Durham. Your entry in the deletion log says WP:G6.
I try to keep track of why articles I started were deleted. I don't remember asking for this article to be deleted. And I don't see anyone raising any concerns over it on my talk page. Can you detail for me why it was deleted? Geo Swan (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete it? Instead of editing it for the better? I know it did not have any useful info. Thats why you EDIT. actually reasearch and put info on it! Recourses resourses resourses! Phooey.
--Mopalanhenterson (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Jamie☆S93 18:56, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Aude,
I'm a user of Wikitravel Japanese version. Also I'm a user of ja.wp and osm. Sorry for writing things about Wikitravel.
I'm operating a bot for maintaining interlanguage links on half of Wikitravel language versions, and I'd like to contribute with the bot to remains including Arabic version and Wikitravel shared. So I applied for bot flags at script nominations on shared. I would appreciate it if you support me in bot flags of shared and the remaining 9 language versions, and if you flip a bot flag for wikitravel:ar:مستخدم:Tatatabot. Can you take a look at wikitravel:shared:Script nominations#Tatatabot? Thank you in advance. -- Tatata (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
The DC meetup is coming up fairly soon, so perhaps as organizer you could fill in the finalized venue details. Thanks!--Pharos (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply at the signpost-out of interest when will that release go live on Wikipedia? Cheers, Dottydotdot (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I was hoping you might be able to advise, vis-a-vis everything really. I must I'm a bit lost now and don't really know what to do. Evidently, the layout presented last week (or rather, the content included) was not very good. I really didn't want to cause disagreement, and I'm eager to get it right this week. You mentioned something bot-related might be better placed in the technology report, so here I am, happy to learn from my mistakes. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 17:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Aude, my pleasure to present a senior-editor award to you. This summer you'll be editing Wikipedia for five years. Edits by the account user:aude number well over 24,000 edits, actually are above 33,000. What would Wikipedia be without you? Dedalus (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude, it's great to see you've signed on for a Technical / MediaWiki panel! It would be cool if you could recruit any partners you know who would be good to join you on that panel.--Pharos (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I actually just finished F&A. We can publish yours, if you'd like. Let me know. ÷seresin 22:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Aude. It's been awhile since our last encounter. I hope you are well. I came upon this page today, which is badly in need of some TLC. I instantly thought of you. :) Best regards, momoricks 04:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
I just saw your piece for the Signpost: great work - and a neat technical overview. Might it be possible for me to write a "What the Toolserver can do for you" piece for the following week's signpost, do you think? I end up handling a lot of such requests. - Jarry1250 (t, c, rfa) 11:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
The record shows you deleted the article Jason Durham, as a WP:CSD#G6.
Could you please direct me to the place where the deletion of this article was discussed?
Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 00:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I'm still finishing up News and notes; I may be gone by the time everything is ready, but seresin or you or someone else can do the final publishing steps when it's ready. FYI, I'll be on wikibreak for a road trip for about two weeks, starting in a few hours.--ragesoss (talk) 18:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I just finished with ITN -- I think the issue is ready to go. I duplicated the story about Jackson b/c it's such big news -- the N&N story focuses on the traffic issue. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 00:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! It looks great. I've been meaning to give this to you for the last few weeks, and now's as good a time as any:
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
For outstanding work on the Wikipedia Signpost, especially regular work on B.R.I.O.N., I award Aude this Signpost Barnstar.--ragesoss (talk) 01:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC) |
For those of you who signed up early, Wiki-Conference New York has been confirmed for the weekend of July 25-26 at New York University, and we have Jimmy Wales signed on as a keynote speaker.
There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Aude, if you can recall your work in creating this file in 2006, can you please state if this chart is adjusted for the Clinton-era refactoring of the unemployment metrics, as reported in http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1995/10/art3full.pdf? It has come to my attention that Wikipedia may be seriously misreporting historical US unemployment statistics pre and post-1995/1996, similar to ignoring the effects of monetary inflation upon the general price level when comparing historical prices. Thank you. - 63.226.190.134 (talk) 17:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Sure thing. Enjoy your travels! - Jarry1250 [ humourous – discuss ] 15:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Washington Metro has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! I hope you feel better soon. I look forward to seeing you this weekend in NYC; it's been a while.--ragesoss (talk) 16:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Italian wiki main page in internet explorer.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 05:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you doing a tech report this week? Cheers,--ragesoss (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
--NBahn (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude,
I note that you at one point agreed that Thierry Meyssen should be added in the Flight 77 article. I'd appreciate if you would kindly explain the reasons for this position, and, if you have changed your position, the reasons for the change since I'm currently in a dispute with USER:Crum375 on the flight 77 talk page re: the inclusion of the conspiracy section.ArXivist (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey, here's the file for the example used on PA 159, which is under the Allegheny Reservoir. Also, should we discuss more factually accuracy for OSM when its appointed?Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 00:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.
There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.
--User:Nbahn 04:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Just checking in about the tech report. Cheers--ragesoss (talk) 17:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
hello aude! i am already here in ba und looking forward to my first wikimania. why i am here? i am analysing wikipedia in my phd project and i ask to what extent the wikipedia is a translingual space of political knowledge production. on the wikimania i hope to get contacts to people that are interested in political issues and/or editing in the en, fr or de wikipedia. hence, i would love to get to know you since your activities looks so interesting... i hope we get in touch. i will have a poster so that if you like, you can meet me there.... hope to see u!! --Jojoona (talk) 19:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Aude, you have made some awesome notes of Wikimania meetings. Thank you! Dedalus (talk) 21:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
User:Aude has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks, Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Not neutral. HaireDunya (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Would you have an update on your research into the OTRS situation with this article? Cla68 (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators, Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atta in airport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ÷seresin 02:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Aude,
I added some ideas about the data.wikimedia.org proposal]. I though you might be interested, the diff : http://strategy.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proposal_talk:Data.wikimedia.org&diff=22632&oldid=16754
Hashar
Hi. Since you're an admin and a member of the Military History WikiProject, feel free to list yourself here. Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 16:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, Aude. In response to a user's comment, I coded up a template for showing article comments inline on Signpost articles. It's now ready to use and working beautifully. I'd highly value your feedback before I deploy it to the article template etc: discussion is here. PretzelsTalk! 18:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
I've just undeleted Wikipedia:Self-linking pages and moved it to Wikipedia:Historical archive/Self-linking pages, to preserve the page history. I did it impulsively when finding it in someone's deleted contributions list; I *hate* it when harmless old page history gets deleted. The page would never have passed MFD in 2009; it was a valid maintenance project that was soon abandoned. I'm notifying you since you nominated it for deletion. Graham87 13:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:21, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
I think it's been delivered already, looks like User:MZMcBride is the go to person. I guess we have to leave something for the chief to do. :) Hiding T 09:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
The Signpost Barnstar | ||
for diligently writing the tech report every week, helping out wherever needed, and stepping in to help out with publication -- thanks!! You're awesome. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 21:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atta in airport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I request usurpation on French Wikipedia. --Aude (talk) 13:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
FYI, User talk:Brianboulton#Press request. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, was testing my TW mod, didn't realize that you created my userpage like four years ago :) Tim Song (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Aude. Don't want to tread on your toes, so wanted to check to see if you were going to cover WP:VPT#Is our registration form user-friendly ? in the signpost? Seems more your patch than mine. Hiding T 14:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey is your name Aude? I have never meet someone else named Aude that I was not related to. Do you live near DC? I am just 4 hours from there. Carlaude:Talk 21:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
awesome :) Will you have time to turn it into a story, or should I work on it? Any pictures? Thanks! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 17:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)