Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. ![]() |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.53.214.86) is used to identify you instead.
I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Happy editing! --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed that you've been adding a lot of content to articles with odd edit summaries that don't match their edits. Just as an example, in your most recent edit you deleted a whole paragraph and moved some content around all with the summary "Added wikilink." From now on, can you please try to use edit summaries that accurately reflect your edits? Thanks in advance. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
You continue to use edit summaries that don't reflect the changes you're making. For instance, in this edit you added a sentence to George Papadopoulos, plus a supporting reference. However your edit summary was just "Added reference." A more appropriate and less misleading edit summary might be something like "Added sentence about fiancee, plus supporting reference." In contrast, here in an example of an edit that you appropriately summarized as "Added reference." --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MadeYourReadThis (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! 67.53.214.86,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! VKZYLUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 05:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Lyudmila Putina.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Home Lander (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dan arndt (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Hello 67.53.214.86, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to VTB Bank have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as List of people sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Please see WP:Logo for how to add a logo.
Hope this helps! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please can you respond to talk page and explain why you interpret the citations you used as supporting the claims you added to the VTB_Bank#History section for "29 July 2014" and "22 December 2015". I would also appreciate if you could indicate if you are making these changes as part of your employment or if it is done in your personal capacity. Soh.Miero (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, it is a reliable source from the United States government.67.53.214.86 (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)So what are you saying, there is a connection, you believe there must be? Without a source it's purely a POV to draw a connection between them. See also can be easily abused that way, implying things otherwise unsourced. Also, see also isn't a random list of people someone might have known, there need be a strong and compelling reason to link. -- GreenC 05:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I see in a recent addition to List of people sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis you included material from this document. That's okay, since the Council of the European Union allows reproduction of their documents, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:41, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
» Shadowowl | talk 09:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anthony Kennedy into Deutsche Bank. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
I am the sole author of the prose that was copied.
Also, the passage had been deleted from wikipedia.
The material on the Anthony Kennedy page had been deleted because the passage was more to do with relationship among persons at Deutsche Bank (Justin Kennedy, who is Anthony Kennedy's son, and others) and Deutsche Bank's unusual relationships with Donald Trump. I had written the passage, but it had been removed from Anthony Kennedy's page by SunCrow because "remove ridiculous footnote that has to do with Donald Trump and has nothing to do with Anthony Kennedy". I could not deny what SunCrow stated. The passage was more appropriate somewhere else.
You are very correct for this user to state that the passage had come from a previous article. However, the passage had been deleted from the article.
I'll state a more appropriate remark in future edits so that the location of the original passage will be included, even if the passage has been deleted.
Thank you for giving me the useful recommendations. I'll be more specific in the remarks. 67.53.214.86 (talk) 22:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. X1\ (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
... and
Thank you some more. X1\ (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. only (talk) 01:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)See admission of sock or meatpuppetry at [1]. only (talk) 01:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alina Kabaeva. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tulsi Gabbard. Stop violating WP:SYNTH by connecting various sources in a novel manner. Your first indication of such a violation would be that the topic of the article is not mentioned at all in the source. Binksternet (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rise Up (Parachute Club song) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Rise Up (Parachute Club song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNwuB76pBcc, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16yRIFwvnUQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robert Moore. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to Kroll Inc. has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to chip in at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#The eXile. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Alger Hiss—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 04:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 67.53.214.86 and WP:BLP. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Jayjg (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Jayron32 12:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Frankly, I am pretty fed up with your changes in Martin Schlaff. It took me nearly ten hours of analyzing the changes and doing additional research until I found out that your work is definetely not based on facts. If you want to describe Schlaff as a bad man or as a villain, Wikipedia is not the right forum. I do not understand what your intentions are! If he commited crimes, we will report it (after the verdict). If not, we will not report it. You cite The Martin Schlaff Saga by Gidi Weitz six times, a trashy piece of tabloid journalism. (It was already mentioned in the section False accusations, before your changes). In addition, you cite Belton who cited Weitz without any verification. Rumors, hearsay, gossip and defamation.... I have to revert most of your changes. Please stay away from this article!--Gideon Hirsch (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |