GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I was just going to trim the plot for this article, but upon reading it I decided the prose was not at Good article standard. For example: Grammatical errors

Also many of the sentences do not really make sense unless you have some inside knowledge (I presume).

And some don't appear to serve any purpose

That is just the plot summary, which is also too detailed about minor incidents and assumes too much knowledge of the programme (I didn't even know who he was going to be married to untill near the end). AIRcorn (talk) 10:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I passed this a long while ago. Looking back, the prose is still really bad. I think it just seemed a lot better compared to what it was. Do with it what you'd like.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted Problems still remain. AIRcorn (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]