This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trucks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military land vehicles task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War I task force

Text and/or other creative content from Three-wheeled steam tank was copied or moved into Steam Wheel Tank on July 7, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

There is no way that the armament could have been a Browning M2HB .50 caliber machinegun, as neither the .50 caliber cartridge nor the Browning .50 caliber machinegun was adopted until 1921. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.154.20 (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Steam Tank, the Steam Wheel Tank, and the 150 Ton Field Monitor were three different things. Have corrected. I suspect that the original article relied heavily on American Military Vehicles of World War One by Albert Mroz, arguably the worst book on the subject ever written. http://63528.activeboard.com/t44712478/the-amazing-mr-mroz/ Hengistmate (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A merger is being proposed that would merge content from Three-wheeled steam tank into this article. Please comment. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Proposer comments. This is a 're-listing' of a proposal originally made back in 2012, for which no discussion was held. There is enough ambiguity here that the attention of subject-matter experts will be helpful. In particular, one of the articles suggests that the two page titles were simply different names for the same thing. However, some of the content suggests that the three-wheeled machine was a special case of a larger class of steam wheeled tanks. A proper merge will require resolution of this question. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge performed on July 7, 2016. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article contained major flaws. It was badly researched, relying on a single source that contained flaws. Those have now been corrected, and additional reliable sources have been presented. To anticipate possible objections: the 75mm howitzer shown in the picture is not connected with the Steam Wheel Tank. It is probably from the earlier Gas-electric Tank - the photo was taken at an exhibition at Aberdeen in the 1920s, and the howitzer happened to be in the shot. Hengistmate (talk) 12:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]