This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Trains Trains Portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Well, Shanghai North Railway Station and Shanghai Railway Museum are talking about the same site and the same buildings, if different uses. They should be merged into a single article covering both aspects.

I think merge here as the current use, with the original station dealt with in its history. Thoughts? — LlywelynII 10:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should be proposed via Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, rather than an RfC, LlywelynII (I have also removed the policy category from the RfC template, as this discussion does not concern a proposed change to Wikipedia policy). Cordless Larry (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

...or if you think the proposed merger is uncontroversial, then you can just go ahead and make it. See Wikipedia:Merging. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, no need for an RfC on what is no more (probably much less) than a WP:PM matter; accordingly, I've delisted it from the RfC pages. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]