![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Content of at least one revision of the associated article was derived in whole or part from non-free copyrighted material on the website https://irelandsreversediscrimination.wordpress.com/. This material was (prior to placement or subsequently) freely licensed in a manner compatible for Wikipedia's use by the posting of one or more compatible copyright licenses on the external website. Though the release notice for the material, which is irrevocable, may have been later removed from view, or the URL may have changed or gone dead, an archive of that webpage, including the copyright release notice, is available at https://archive.ph/Ph4o0. |
Please select one license only. The document can't be both released under a Creative Commons license and released into the public domain. Choose one or the other. Thanks,— Diannaa (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
All associated posts have been deleted from https://irelandsreversediscrimination.wordpress.com/ There is no copyright infringement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean4780 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&oldid=1087447326&action=compare&url=https%3A%2F%2Firelandsreversediscrimination.wordpress.com%2F
Result
Violation Unlikely
0.0%
The page is still copyright, and is still visible as it was archived by the Wayback Machine.— Diannaa (talk) 00:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
The issue seems to be the author is using language similar to a blog he has written on the subject. I don't see a copyright issue. The problem is it's not very well-written, but it is amply referenced with 70 reliable sources. Anaxagoras17 (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Okay, so the copyright status of the text that was previously published on Wordpress is good and cleared up. I'm less clear about the abundance of quotes on this page - we've got court rulings and laws from a number of different countries, and conformity studies which were done "prepared by Milieu Ltd. in consortium with the Europa Institute, Edinburgh University under Contract". Off the top of my head, I don't know for sure which if any of those are subject to copyright protection or not. My knowledge of EU law is not on par with my knowledge of US law. That said, if the conformity studies are the works of Milieu and/or Europa and not government works, then that's clearer - the current Edinburgh Europa Institute website specifically states "Unless explicitly stated otherwise, all material is copyright © 2021 The University of Edinburgh." Does anybody here have a better knowledge of EU law regarding government publications and/or the circumstances around which the conformity studies were created? VernoWhitney (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Some suggestions:
– Kaihsu (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Some earlier discussion here: User_talk:Storchy#Reverse_Discrimination_explained_as_"One_must_bear_in_mind_that_this_phenomena_is_a_result_of_disloyal_position_of_the_state_towards_its_own_citizens" Kaihsu (talk) 10:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)