![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 'text' doesn't show. It has never did. Firefox latest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.29.185 (talk) 05:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
I think the whole 3rd paragraph should go, as it is completely dated. --Yak 15:07, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)
the cities name like (poor or pur ) may be originated from india
How can it originate from India, if sumeria and akkadian are older civilization.
The entire 1911 encyclopedia Archaeology section needs to be removed. I am going to baby step this by adding new stuff and then eventually one day blanking the 1911 stuff, which will then be reverted, an event I am hoping to avert with this note. :-) Ploversegg (talk) 21:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)ploversegg
It would be great to have some dates for this section -- even rough ones would help (6th millemium BC; middle of the 5th millennium BC). Thanks. Athana (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Given the Nibru element? I know all of the 10th Planet stuff is nonsense. I've read the main theory among real scholars is Nibiru was a name for Jupiter, that could fit this city's association with Enlil.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nippur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The later two sections of the archaeology part of this article were cribbed from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britanica [1]. Plan to delete them after I ponder to see if there is anything worth saving.Ploversegg (talk) 01:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Removed one. The rest is about the Murashu archive so will have to coord change with that article. A job for another day. And note that some of the History paras are also so cribbed.Ploversegg (talk) 15:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Either might be acceptable, but as things stand now both are used repeatedly in this article. There should be consistency. Dgndenver (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
I added a recent ISAC Nippur video to the ext links section.
Having now watched it I can say it was quite good.Ploversegg (talk) 02:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)