speedy close - keep, 20 March 2008, see discussion.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Since there is already a discography page for this artist, I have moved singles, mixtapes and extended album details to the page at Nicole Wray discography. As a result, the artist page is now more concise. Cloudz67911:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have once again "cleaned up" this section. I hope the concensus here is that the full discography is better suited to being on an alternative suitable page (already linked in my previous post). Cloudz67901:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:N20.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot05:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Make It Hot.JPG[edit]
Image:Make It Hot.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot03:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair use rationale for Image:Lovechild album.jpg[edit]
Image:Lovechild album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot05:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nicole Wray is not a rapper. She doesn't record rap albums and she isn't known for her rapping. Just because one user thinks she should be categorised as a rapper, doesn't mean this should be on her wikipedia entry. Cloudz679 (talk) 09:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have again removed the "unreleased albums". No sourcing is provided to demonstrate that these particular supposed albums are any more notable than countless other similar fare. They do not deserve their own articles, nor do they belong on the discography. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have yanked them again. This time, though, instead of "Soccermeko", it was "Nekoangel16" or "Nekoangel17" or... It's hard to keep track of all of him. The smell of socks is overwhelming. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree: unreleased "albums", mixtapes, etc. should go unless there are citations to reliable sources demonstrating that they are, in some meaningful way, notable. All unsourced/poorly sourced nicknames should go. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I gave you a list of reliable sources. I gave you one for Elektric Blue, Lovechild, and her new album. I gave sources about her mixtapes and eps and it proves that they are valuable to being apart of the profile and discography. And you didn't get the sources i will provide them again, shortly. Soccermeko (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than the repeated edit, revert, re-revert, re-re-revert edit war here, please discuss this.
1) What names belong here? Names shown on albums, "street" names, names announced as, etc.
2) Is there a wikipedia guideline on this?
3) Are sources needed?
4) Are sources shown?
Names belonging in the alias field, as demonstrated at the wikipedia guideline at template:Infobox_Musical_artist#Alias, are for official stage names (e.g. NOT nicknames such as The Godfather of Soul for James Brown). Official stage names are those in which she has appeared. The 1998 album was released with the name Nicole (source: amazon.com).
I don't think sources are generally needed but for something which clearly is not a stage name, i.e.
This misinformation is unencyclopaedic and should be removed. As an additional comment, the multiple results on the second search are copies of the first and not independent pages.
If you're so sure of yourself why can't you reference it. The guidelines above are very clear. She's made no releases under any name other than Nicole and Nicole Wray. Cloudz679 (talk) 15:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
do not call her new 2008 album, her second studio album because she said that she will be releasing her other album "Elektric Blue" and "Lovechild" in the fall of 2008. you have to call it either a "new album", "upcoming 2008 album", or "fourth studio album". 4.154.2.73 (talk) 20:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
New editor has a familiar writing style... In any event, the album might or might not have a title. When it has a reliable source saying it has a title, then it 'will have a title. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If it is to be removed then everyone must be able to edit the page. To help with the circumstances, you need to fall under these categories. Must be a user for at a month, must not continue to engage in an edit war with another user, must not block every user for their on belief in trying to prove that they were a sockpuppet. I trying to make this fair for everybody, I don't want to see the page be deleted but it most if everything continues the way it was. 4.129.65.144 (talk) 16:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As with any other page in Wikipedia, anyone can edit any page unless the page is protected or semi-protected. In the latter case, anyone can edit the page if they get an account, wait 4 days, and possibly make some small number of edits. The only exceptions are blocked or banned users. They are almost always blocked or banned either because they have abused Wikipedia or, in the case of users editing anonymously, someone using their IP address has abused Wikipedia or the IP address is otherwise not welcome to edit anonymously or at all.
This article has been semi-protected in the past to deal with vandalism, but is currently not protected. Unless you are a blocked user or are suspected of being one, or you are editing from an IP address that Wikipedia does not want to be used to edit articles anonymously, you should be able to edit the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding "To help with the circumstances, you need to fall under these categories. Must be a user for at a month, must not continue to engage in an edit war with another user, must not block every user for their on belief in trying to prove that they were a sockpuppet.":
Unless the article is under the auspices of WP:ARBCOM, the only restrictions that will be enforced are those already in place as policy or guideline. "Must be a user for a month" - will not be enforced. "Must not continue to engage in an edit war with another user" - will be enforced according to letter and spirit of WP:3RR, which allows for blocking after multi-day edit wars that don't meet the "3 reverts in a day" criteria. "Must not block every user for their on (sic), own? belief in trying to prove that they were a sockpuppet." - usually, sockpuppet allegations to got WP:CHECKUSER or other forums to verify the allegation. However, since actual sockpuppets typically aren't noticed until they engage in disruptive behavior, odds are, if someone is a suspected sockpuppet, they've already violated a policy or guideline and can probably be blocked or at least on that basis alone, independent of any sockpuppet allegations. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 17:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The listed web site, NicoleWray.net/, does not appear to work. The following web site does indeed work: NicoleWray.com/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theknightb4 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Quick update "I Found You" is not the title of her second studio album you have listed in the discography section of the main wiki page of Nicole; her second studio album is called Kill Cupid, "I Found You" is the name of the lead single from the album & it got released on iTunes a few weeks ago — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.115.168.7 (talk) 19:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The discography section of this article lists her only album, Make It Hot and the single "I Found You". It does not say there is a second album. Note the formatting: Album title vs. "Song title". - SummerPhD (talk) 20:50, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, is there anyway you could remove the song title, because it seems out of place when you just have one released album and one released single, when she had more than one song as an official single. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.115.168.7 (talk) 19:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the single and accompanying reference to the discography page. Main page just points to discography page and lists her, as yet, only released album. Cloudz679 (talk) 20:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unreleased albums will be included since it is stated in the article. It is unfair that thousands of other wiki articles have valuable pieces of information like Nicole Wray and hers is excluded for whatever reason. Do not revert/undo my corrections otherwise I will report you. If you need additional sources for references/citations then just e-mail me otherwise do not undo it based on your desire. Thanks. - Klimax68 (talk) 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Previous discussion on this very point decided that we were not including her various shelved albums. When you are reverted, discuss the issue and seek consensus on the talk page before restoring the material. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with you and Cloudz679 is that you both are in cahoots (or obviously controlled by only one user) and do not give full explanation as to why you will not allow the unreleased albums. My point is that if there are other wiki articles with unreleased LP's in a discography list, then that will not make one bit of sense for Nicole Wray's unreleased LPs to be excluded. How can an agreement be made from 3 to 4 years ago, without other users or my involvement. I have recently joined Wikipedia and the discussion never involved me, so your point is invalid. Furthermore, I had made additional corrections and by placing reliable sourced links intact with the LP names in the discography section. For you to remove it based off your desire, is unfair. There will not be an agreement reached because your persistent reverting demonstrates your selfishness and lack of patience when it comes to new edits by other users. Klimax68 (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is logical that unreleased albums and mixtapes are not notable, and the existence of this information on other articles is not relevant. If you cannot show how it is relevant then there is no reason for it to be included. Wikipedia works by consensus of multiple editors and there is evidently no consensus here to include such trivial information. Cloudz67922:22, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The unreleased albums are very relevant and been highly noted as part of her career. I'm not asking to create individual wiki articles on the albums all I'm trying to do is add the other two unreleased albums under her "solo discography". Furthermore, the LP's have been a hot topic for the singer in most of her interviews following 2002 to this present day. As I stated before, the absence of this vital information is confusing; it's ridiculous to say the least how you "two" will not simply allow the titles under the solo discography, even when I do offer references intact with reliable sources. Klimax68 (talk) 00:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As I believe I have made clear, if you would like to open a sock puppetry case to determine if Cloudz and I are either the same person or meat puppets, please do so. If you need assistance, I can certainly walk you through, as I have started several myself. Otherwise, I will consider further insinuations to be mere personal attacks, which is against our policies.
As both Cloudz and I have explained above, mixtapes and unreleased albums are simply not notable. I understand you are not trying to start individual articles for them this time. Nevertheless, without coverage in reliable sources, there is nothing to add. Your latest attempted additions here were "sourced" as follows:
"Wray released a mixtape, Boss Bitch, in hopes of garnering buzz for her forthcoming album tentatively titled, Kill Cupid." Source? An itunes download page showing the non-notable mixtape exists. No indication whatsoever that the supposedly "forthcoming" album (from two years ago!) exists.
"In July 2011, Wray released a lead single, "I Found You", from her upcoming solo album, Kill Cupid." Again, an itunes download page shows the song exists. Nothing indicates it is "a lead single" or from the always "upcoming" solo album.
"In 2012, Wray joined R&B/Soul duo, Lady, with fellow independent English singer, Terri Walker. The duo are set to release their self-titled debut album via Truth & Soul Records yielding a recent leaked record, "Money", as a lead single for the project." Sourced to a blog*, we hear their debut is "set to appear". Heck, they've been at it since 2009, 2 years before Wray had that "forthcoming" album ready to burst outta the gates at ... any ... moment ... now ...
(*How do we know this is not a reliable source? See all of those green links? The one for "Walker", for instance, takes you to a site selling medical supplies. You know, like walkers. THAT'S HOW YOU PAY FOR A BLOG. Do they "have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy"? That depends. Do you have a "graving"{sic} for "SOUL" music? How about that author: JusMusic he's the "Founder and Creator of Singersroom.com" (translation: blogger) and a "Producer/Songwriter". Heck, he even has a website, http://www.jusmusic.com/ is, um, developing a website for his "movement". "Watch (him) grow!"
Frankly, there is nothing to add here. You disagree. I get it. From here, I see several ways this can go:
1: Independent reliable sources suddenly realize Wray is about to conquer the world and start covering her.
2: You establish that Cloudz and I one person (editing under two names for 6 years specifically to be able to undermine Wray).
3: Another editor shows up to support you, sock case ensues.
@Sackkid: AllMusic is generally not recommended as a source for biographical information such as a person's date of birth. If there is no other source that verifies that information, then it could be used. Also, your account is already autoconfirmed, meaning you are able to add this information to the article yourself. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it first say 1981 like in the infobox then in the early life section it says 1979? Oldschoollover24 (talk) 17:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]