This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of countries with highest military expenditures article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about List of countries with highest military expenditures. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about List of countries with highest military expenditures at the Reference desk.

List of countries by military expenditure share of GDP was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 November 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of countries with highest military expenditures. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

A fact from List of countries with highest military expenditures appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in 2004, the world spent US$896,235 million on military expenditures and the U.S. military budget constituted 41 percent of this, placing the nation at top of the list of countries by military expenditures? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/September.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: National CL‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles CL This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force Countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles WikiProject Countries to-do list: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy. Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region. Other : add ((WPCountries)) to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Jared Wright (May 2011). "What Have We Wrought?". Spectrum Blog.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

$34.6 billion in 2017–18. https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-releases/budget-2017-18-defence-budget-overview The Government will provide Defence with $31.9 billion in 2015–16 and $132.6 billion over the Forward Estimates. http://www.defence.gov.au/Budget/15-16/

There was new data released by SIPRI on 24 April 2023, which could be added to the main page: Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2022. Kookiethebird (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neither War on the Rocks nor Defense News is unbiased. They are appendages of the military industrial complex. So why are their opinions acceptable in this context? Of course opposing views could be included. Nicmart (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The table IISS was replaced by GF on August 2, 2024 with the justification quote: (published a better list with a more comprehensive source for 2024 military budgets. the previous source makes mistakes about several countries who announced a certain budget but could not follow through like Germany, other countries increased the budget with events in 2024 like Israel and Iran and others). This justification is definitely wrong. Because Germany increased its military budget from 63.86 billion dollars to 78.33 billion dollars. Germany set up a special fund in 2022 in the amount of 109 USD. This special fund runs until 2027 and a certain amount is drawn from it every year and added to the military budget. In 2023 this was 9.17 billion dollars and in 2024 it will be 21.62 billion dollars. These values ​​have been approved by the federal parliament and are law. GF does not take this special fund into account. GF states that its data is valid for 2024.

In addition, the table from Glabal Firepower is riddled with errors

For example: 1 USA GF reports 831.73 billion USD but it is actually 886 billion USD https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-signs-886-billion-us-defense-policy-bill-into-law-2023-12-22/ 2 United Kingdom GF reports 62.81 billion USD but in 2023/24 it is actually 70.05 in 2024/25 it will be 72.86 USD https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8175/#:~:text=How%20much%20does%20the%20UK,expenditure%20that%20meets%20NATO%27s%20definition. 3 Australia GF reports 52.55 billion USD, actually it is 36.8 billion USD in 2024/25 https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2024/05/15/australia-unveils-record-37-billion-defense-budget/ 4 Germany GF reports 55.94 billion USD, actually it is 78.33 billion USD https://www.bmvg.de/de/themen/verteidigungshaushalt

These would be four serious errors in the top 10 alone. In Germany, the special fund was not taken into account. In Australia, Australian dollars were confused with US dollars. I cannot explain the errors in the United Kingdom and the United States.

As the GF table is heavily inaccurate and provides incorrect information, I suggest deleting it and re-entering the previous table. Slim Nesbit (talk) 18:13, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]