This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
I am currently trying to find a home for this list of chess periodicals listed here. How do people feel about relaxing the inclusion criteria to include serials that are defunct? John Vandenberg06:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the list should ever have been limited to current publications. We could create a new section for periodicals that are no longer published, or we could put everything into a table with start and end date columns. (The class="sortable" table would allow that to be sorted to put all the current publications together.) Quale11:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
John, thanks for letting me know. Initially, when I drafted this chart, I put in starting and ending dates, but I found that most of the chess periodicals I knew about were current, so I arbitrarily decided to limit it to current publications. As Quale wisely points out, there is no reason to impose such an arbitrary limitation. I would recommend creating a separate table for defunct periodicals and serials, but the idea to add an end-date column to the current table is also fine. I'm happy to see that other editors are expanding on the work that I began. Good luck. Shalom Hello14:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I should have worded my comment differently, as it wasn't meant to be a criticism. The list of current periodicals is very good, and we work with the information we have at hand. Expanding the article to include defunct publications would be good, but requires more research. We can do it incrementally in the finest WikiPedia tradition. Quale15:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Shakhmaty v SSSR is defunct, as noted. Also sadly gone are 'Shakhmaty Riga' and 'Shakhmaty'. All three were published monthly. I recall that both my postman and my security officer were decidedly unamused when these four were added to my long-standing subscription to '64'. Lots of great material for us postalites {grin}. Chess Review was rolled into 'Chess Life', IIRC. Don't have a copy to hand, but the masthead carried the date that they became the official organ (lower digestive {grin}) of the USCF. Best regards - Drieux 10:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drieux (talk • contribs)
After adding some journals, I feel the table format is far too restricting. They are a lot of minor chess magazines that don't warrant a whole article, but for which it would be nice to say a few words about. Does anyone object formatting this article similar to List of chess terms? Voorlandt (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I don't see much need for the sorting that the table provides. It would be good to be able to have a little bit of text about them. Bubba73(talk), 00:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find it in the Library of Congress or (ironically) in the Columbia University online catalogs, but the University of Wisconsin-Madison says it has a few issues. It seems that it probably had a five year run starting in 1887 and ending in 1891. http://madcat.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?BBID=7131878
I have just modified one external link on List of chess periodicals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 6 external links on List of chess periodicals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.