Lake Street Transfer station is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 25, 2023.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 3, 2022 Good article nominee Listed October 13, 2022 Featured article candidate Not promoted December 20, 2022 Featured article candidate Promoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 1, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Lake Street Transfer was a double-decked transfer station accommodating two different elevated lines? Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chicago Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Stations. This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lake Street Transfer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@John M Wolfson: Almost there. A comparatively small GA, but that's not an impediment; it just needs an alt tag and some comma removals and other cleanup. 7-day hold; ping me when done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie I have done all of what you suggested. In the future please feel free to make minor edits yourself; this applies to my featured content candidacies as well. In any event thank you for the quick and succinct review! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Add a comma before one block away
• respectively constructed in 1893 and 1895 change to constructed in 1893 and 1895, respectively
• Stations were regularly-spaced across the route, and included one on Wood Street Remove hyphen and comma
• Remove comma after remain standing
• Change were removed in the late 1950s to "was" to conform with "wooden material" (singular)

• The image is appropriately licensed but needs an alt tag. |alt=Refer to caption suffices here.
• Earwig mostly catches organization names.
• References archived.