This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Child erotica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't this be removed on the grounds that it promotes child pedophilia? 94.133.68.129 (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this page enables such, but I might recommend moving this article into its own section in the "underage pornography" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totodile493 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Child erotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The article lead seems to go into great detail of actually not explaining what child erotica is instead focusing on the use. Under this though practically any image can be considered erotica even that of a child in a onesie. I know some consider it to be provocative images intended to arouse like scantily dressed ones or nude ones posed for this purpose where pornography is images involving sex. I'd rather have such definitions included. Biofase flame| stalk 07:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)