This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
5th symphony, slow movement main theme (duplets in oboe melody against triplets in string pizzicato accompaniment)
6th symphony, first movement (main theme and ostinato accompaniment, also second theme)
8th symphony, first movement, second theme (same rhythm as 4th symphony example given already)
Btw, although it's great to have musical examples, it would probably be more useful if they were in the treble or bass clefs, since many more people can understand them.
Grover cleveland18:10, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is my long time understanding that Bruckner rhythm is the juxtaposition (2 + 3) of a duplet melody followed by a triplet bass, and not the superposition of triplets upon duplets (as in the opening statement of the main theme of the Adagio of the 5th symphony). Moreover, in the long restatement of the main theme the triplet bass is replaced by a quarter + two eighths figure.
In the 4th symphony, the Bruckner rhythm that we all know from the Finale was not there: it was originally in quintuplets, exceedingly difficult to play. And the original Scherzo (predating the usual "Hunting" Scherzo) had similtaneous duplets against triplets. The original (1874) version has been recorded by Jesus Lopez-Cobos with the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra.
Ah yes, that's a nice recording of an interesting version. A little too repetitive in spots, but still quite fascinating to listen to. Anton Mravcek21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I find the endless use of 'occurs' very strange, as if Bruckner's (and others) pieces weren't written but just found in that state, like fossils. But such things don't just 'occur' - they are used, written, utilized, employed etc by a living person in their works. Maybe because I'm composer I find that objectionable, but it's bad writing, in a way pointed out in every good writing guide--it's a needlessly dead, passive verb. The composer's missing. 110.20.157.59 (talk) 08:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]