![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Barry Glendenning be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A link highlighting one of his inflammatory Guardian articles was provided. It also details a small portion of comment from the section of Northern Irish society he habitually insults. The Guardian even thought it necessary to moderate their own reporters comments on his own blog. This is all simple unequivocal fact.
What is the reason for censorship? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gridsquareremoval (talk • contribs) 16:59, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Glendenning is something of a love/hate figure on the Football Weekly podcast. Likewise, he is the most likely to respond to comments, and has been to respond to trolls and a do some troll-baiting himself. Thus, his page is vandalized surprisingly frequently. I would suggest some sort of protection of this page (such as it being partially protected) in order to discourage vandalism.Eriol11 (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)eriol11
I don't see why a journalist, however provocative he may be regarded as being, deserves any better "protection" than that offered to any other public figure? If no evidence is provided of accustions, obviously they can be removed; otherwise if "controversy" is his stock in trade then that should be reflected in his entry.--Oneill1921 (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Oneill1921
How can he hear the sound of his voice if he's blowing a trumpet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.70.11 (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barry Glendenning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Barry has had a great season this year and will probably win this league very soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.165.184 (talk) 10:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)