A fact from Army Gold Medal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the British Army Gold Cross awarded to field and general officers during the Peninsular War inspired the design of the Victoria Cross? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/August.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Culture / British / European Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force British military history task force European military history task force

I have reviewed this article for the Military History project and believe that it is currently a Start class article. Please note that the project template does not support C class, so it is either a Start or a B and as currently I don't feel it quite meets B1 and B2 of the B class criteria I must rate it as a Start. I feel that the article could be raised up to B class with only a few tweaks, however, as it is pretty close. The following improvements might help:

• Coverage: Could the article be expanded to discuss the history of the medal a bit more. Currently it provides a date when it was instituted, but does not discuss how, when, where, why etc. in the body of the text. Perhaps a brief paragraph could be added under a section heading such as Institution or similar, in which these things could be discussed.
• Referencing: generally not bad at all, however, I feel a couple of extra citations would improve the article. These could be added in the following places where important points are made that might be questioned (I'm certainly not questioning them, but someone might come along and want to find where those points are discussed in sources, so a cite would help - if they are the same as the cite already mentioned in the paragraph, please just add that cite and consolidate the ref):
  • Second paragraph, Awards section: at the end of the second sentence that discusses the number of awards that Wellington received;
  • Second paragraph, Discontinuation section: at the end of the third sentence, discussing the eligible engagements for the MGSM including Egypt.
• An image of the medal and or ribbon would greatly improve the article (but is not required for B class and I understand that a suitable one might not be available for use).

Anyway, that is it for now. Good work so far. If you wish to seek re-assessment later, please add the article to the list at WP:MHA. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 01:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I have plans for the article, but not enough time! Anyway, useful links to remind me: [1] [2] [3] Gwinva (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As requested. Shimgray | talk | 14:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have translated and added to the article on the Dutch Wikipedia. To us, in the Netherlands, it would be of some interest to know the six military engagements that were remembered on the Prince's cross and his two clasps. Our Prince, later King William II of the Netherlands wore his Golden Cross on many occasions.

The sources that I have ar not specific.

The exact name of the decoration is somewhat ambigious. Was it instituted as simply "a gold cross". Was it instituted by an Order in Council, a warrant or a simple order by the Ministry of War?

Faithfully yours,

Robert Prummel (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC) Groningen The Netherlands[reply]

William Carr Beresford, Viscount Beresford is wearing a gold cross, is it the Peninsular Cross?, on a collar with lions and shields.

These two symbols are found on the Army Gold Medal. Is this an honour that was given to him as a veteran of the War in Spain?

It seems likely. He does nor wear his Pensinsular Cross.

Faithfully yours,

Robert Prummel (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Army Gold Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081011194135/http://www.britishmedals.info./army_gold_medal.html to http://www.britishmedals.info/army_gold_medal.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080828042537/http://www.britishmedals.info./army_gold_cross.html to http://www.britishmedals.info/army_gold_cross.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]