GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason this should still need a review so I'll give it a shot. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

I'll put the article on hold for five days and will check back to see if the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed all the issues except the access dates for the references. They require more time than I currently have. Anyone wish to help? — WylieCoyote (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tried doing it myself but based on how the refs are set up adding them is difficult. I'll wait a couple days but it's minor enough that I may pass it anyway; the access dates are more to show the links work, which I already checked with a tool. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, it's a really minor issue, so I'm just going to pass the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.