This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Al Dhafra Air Base article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United Arab EmiratesWikipedia:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesTemplate:WikiProject United Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates articles
At the time the link was added it was freely accessible. It changed to invite-only about August 2012. Since it isn't now accessible I cannot determine how authoritative it is. I did look at in April last year, and the information did appear to be backed by satellite images. Are there any available archives or cached views of the entries we link to?-gadfium21:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Quote: "the French Air Force use the base as French Military Settlement, French Air Force has 600 Mirage 2000-5F, 600 Dassault Rafale C, 51 C-135FR, 21 E-3 Sentry." Somehow I don't think these are the numbers actually deployed to this base. Are they they numbers that the French Air Force has in total? Why are they in this article? The article Abu Dhabi base gives more believable numbers for this base. Oktal (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"French Air Force has 600 Mirage 2000-5F, 600 Dassault Rafale C, 51 C-135FR, 21 E-3 Sentry" - nope, this numbers are BS!! the French Air Force in total doesn't even have nearly that many planes! (i.e. in total: 58x Mirage 2000-5F, 76x Dassault Rafale C, 14x C-135FR, 4x E-3 Sentry)
"380th Air Expeditionary Wing has 120 KC-10 Extender, 14 Boeing E-3 Sentry, 40 U-2 Dragon Lady, 50 RQ-4A/B block 20-30 / EQ-4/RQ-4N Global Hawk deployed to the air base... 240 F-15E strike eagle, 400 F/A-18E Super Hornet, 150 Boeing B-52 Stratofortress Bombers, and 53 Nuclear silos on the base"Garbage!!! The Air Force has i.e. 76x Boeing B-52 in total... also all other numbers are BS!!
Also the US does not have a permanently deployed Patriot Battalion in the UAE!
The corresponding French article has significant differences, at least as to location. The distance from Abu Dhabi differs by about 10 km and the GeoCoord differs by about 30 seconds of latitude and 15 seconds of longitude. I can't read French well even to determine if there are other differences. — Arthur Rubin(talk)17:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, with regards to your latest entry to the article Al Dhafra Air Base I see that you have deleted a sound source replacing it with another one. You can always add additional sources but you cannot call any source "better" and delete it. Therefore I would like you to reinclude the omitted source to the article please. İyi vikiler...Ogün Eratalaymessage11:37, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Ertly I have moved your comment from my UP to here where it belongs. Reuters is written in English, is RS and so is by every measure a "better" source for English WP. Mztourist (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mztourist you add information, not delete it. That should be the attitude for Wiki contributors. Furthermore the event was covered earlier than Reuters in the mentioned source so chronologically it has to be in the sources. Also be it in English or not, it is a source whether you like it or not. Sorry...Ogün Eratalaymessage13:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, if there is a better source that supersedes what's there there is no obligation to retain the original source. It doesn't matter what came first, what matters is what Reliable Source(s) contain the most detail. The Reuters story detailed the missiles used by the Houthis (Zulfiqars), the missiles used to shoot them down (Patriots) and who fired them (US), none of which was contained in the earlier Turkish language source. Mztourist (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]