18:0418:04, 24 January 2017diffhist+1,541
David Malpass
There is nothing whatsoever misleading about this information. I am quoting the subject's own op eds in the Wall Street Journal and the publicly available GDP numbers and stock prices. The talk page has no objections stated on it, so this is concensus.
16 January 2017
18:2118:21, 16 January 2017diffhist+1,541
David Malpass
Undid revision 759399963 by MPS1992 If you cannot explain on the talk page for this article why you think these reputably cited quotes and historic facts should not be included, please do not delete these additions.
16:3616:36, 19 November 2016diffhist+1,564
David Malpass
All original edits were factual, cited, neutral and pertinent for someone who is expected to hold a high position in the Trump administration. No reason to delete them.
17:2917:29, 18 November 2016diffhist+1,564
David Malpass
It appears that the Trump team has multiple people working to keep this information from coming to light. Please lock in my edits.
03:3603:36, 18 November 2016diffhist+1,395
David Malpass
Trump's team does not seem to want the public to know that Malpass's economic forecast for the 2nd half of 2008 was off by 11 percentage points, nor that he was the chief economist at Bear Stearns for the 6 years prior to its collapse. I think they should
03:5003:50, 15 November 2016diffhist+861
David Malpass
Point out the fact that Malpass was the chief economist of Bear Stearns for 6 years leading up to its failure and the decisions to invest heavily in the subprime market were based in part on his advice as chief economist.
19 October 2016
03:2203:22, 19 October 2016diffhist+583
David Malpass
The previous sentence's statement about Malpass's team's ranking would lead the reader to believe that his economic acumen was exceptionally good. However, the failure of Bear Stearns partly was partly a result of his economic forecasts.Tag: Visual edit