21:5921:59, 1 February 2010diffhist−60,368
User talk:SuaveArt
no ban necessary - I'll just leave. If an admin is willing to file a request for comment on my behalf, then I would appreciate it
05:1005:10, 1 February 2010diffhist−308
Pat Robertson
category was removed (and hidden note added) without consensus (Seregain also edit warred to keep it gone after it was reinserted) - source I added is simply used for full Pat Robertson "Scotland" quote
04:3904:39, 1 February 2010diffhist+18
Vision Forum
Whoever said it used the word? That's why "sexist" isn't in the quote. But their allegations are related to sexism (and the site admits it holds "gender roles"), so this is a useful internal link.
04:2904:29, 1 February 2010diffhist+2
Vision Forum
→Criticism: The article doesn't call the group sexist. Midwest Christian Ministries does (you said yourself that's okay) so there's no problem here, plus the site openly admits that it holds sexist views (please read sexism )
04:2104:21, 1 February 2010diffhist+1 m
Vision Forum
NOTE: And for clarification, it was not the NYT, it was another evangelical organization which accused them of being sexist (the site itself admits that it holds gender-discriminatory views, so this claim is accurate and sourced0
04:1704:17, 1 February 2010diffhist0
Vision Forum
They have been accused of sexism, that is what the article states, not that the accuser is "right" (though the group admits it). Fundamentalist is not POV (both terms have legit uses), but I'll replace it with "evangelical"
04:0504:05, 1 February 2010diffhist+2
Vision Forum
please do not revert an entire revision if you only have a problem with a single word - also please discuss on talk page, as the term is actually used in multiple articles - I will assume this edit was made in good faith