8 September 2012
- 21:1521:15, 8 September 2012 diff hist −89 Adam Leitman Bailey Martindale Hubbell is a 150 year old peer review system, and much more reliable than a sensational article in the Real Deal.
7 September 2012
- 16:5016:50, 7 September 2012 diff hist −357 Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey →Edit warring, COI
- 16:3716:37, 7 September 2012 diff hist +186 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
- 16:3416:34, 7 September 2012 diff hist +508 Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey →Edit warring, COI
- 03:3403:34, 7 September 2012 diff hist +469 Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey →This article has been vandalized.
- 03:3003:30, 7 September 2012 diff hist +1,230 Adam Leitman Bailey Just because one publication has negative things to say about Bailey doesn't mean that it should be cited as fact that he is "one of the most controversial lawyers in America." Other publications, like Real Estate Weekly, make no such claims.
- 00:0200:02, 7 September 2012 diff hist +178 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection →Current requests for protection
6 September 2012
- 23:5823:58, 6 September 2012 diff hist +10,686 Adam Leitman Bailey This article has been vandalized. There should be have been a discussion in the Talk page before such a drastic action was taken. Therefore, I am now restoring it to the original full version.
- 23:5723:57, 6 September 2012 diff hist +318 Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey →This article has been vandalized.: new section
- 20:4120:41, 6 September 2012 diff hist +10,850 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
- 20:4020:40, 6 September 2012 diff hist −103 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
- 20:3820:38, 6 September 2012 diff hist −61 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
- 20:2920:29, 6 September 2012 diff hist +10,787 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
14 July 2012
- 19:1219:12, 14 July 2012 diff hist +253 New Milford, New Jersey →Notable residents
- 19:1119:11, 14 July 2012 diff hist +172 New Milford, New Jersey →Notable residents
6 July 2012
- 21:4921:49, 6 July 2012 diff hist +1,047 Talk:Right-wing politics →Perhaps the entire idea of a left-right 1D political spectrum is misguided?: new section
12 June 2012
- 16:1816:18, 12 June 2012 diff hist −1 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 16:1716:17, 12 June 2012 diff hist −34 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 16:1616:16, 12 June 2012 diff hist +333 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 16:1316:13, 12 June 2012 diff hist −38 The Dominick →Overview
- 16:0416:04, 12 June 2012 diff hist +169 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 16:0416:04, 12 June 2012 diff hist +169 The Dominick →Overview
- 00:1900:19, 12 June 2012 diff hist 0 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1900:19, 12 June 2012 diff hist +4 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1500:15, 12 June 2012 diff hist −1 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1400:14, 12 June 2012 diff hist −5 The Dominick →Fraud lawsuit
- 00:1300:13, 12 June 2012 diff hist −4 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1300:13, 12 June 2012 diff hist −19 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1200:12, 12 June 2012 diff hist +1 Adam Leitman Bailey →Trump Soho
- 00:1200:12, 12 June 2012 diff hist +112 The Dominick No edit summary
- 00:1100:11, 12 June 2012 diff hist +1,870 Adam Leitman Bailey No edit summary
- 00:0200:02, 12 June 2012 diff hist −27 The Dominick No edit summary
11 June 2012
- 23:3523:35, 11 June 2012 diff hist +1,415 The Dominick No edit summary
- 22:5022:50, 11 June 2012 diff hist +31 Park51 →Landmark status declined and Litigation
- 22:4822:48, 11 June 2012 diff hist +1,069 Park51 →Landmark status declined
- 16:2716:27, 11 June 2012 diff hist −57 Adam Leitman Bailey There is no article on the talk page devoted to this issue, nor is there any evidence in support of this tag.
5 April 2012
- 21:5221:52, 5 April 2012 diff hist +176 Talk:Right-wing politics →I suggest a request for mediation as a way to solve this
- 09:4809:48, 5 April 2012 diff hist +736 Talk:Right-wing politics →Falconclaw has to produce sources to prove bias
- 09:4109:41, 5 April 2012 diff hist +342 Talk:Right-wing politics →I suggest a request for mediation as a way to solve this
4 April 2012
- 19:2619:26, 4 April 2012 diff hist +665 Talk:Right-wing politics →I suggest a request for mediation as a way to solve this: new section
- 19:1819:18, 4 April 2012 diff hist +27 Right-wing politics I didn't call those who disagree with me Marxist; I said the article was written like a Marxist hit piece, which is true. The focus of the article on social hierarchy and class warfare is a very Marxist trait.
3 April 2012
- 06:5306:53, 3 April 2012 diff hist +27 Right-wing politics Undid revision 485260218 by LittleJerry (talk)
2 April 2012
- 23:4423:44, 2 April 2012 diff hist +10 Right-wing politics No edit summary
1 April 2012
- 07:1007:10, 1 April 2012 diff hist +8 Right-wing politics LittleJerry is the only one who removes my bias tag without explanation or discussion.
- 07:0607:06, 1 April 2012 diff hist +55 Milton Friedman The word "reversed" is inaccurate. The latter statement has nothing to do with FDR's tax policy.
29 March 2012
- 19:2119:21, 29 March 2012 diff hist −73 Right-wing politics Actually, in the interest of fairness, I'm reverting to Rick Norwood's last edit.
- 19:2019:20, 29 March 2012 diff hist +99 Right-wing politics Reverting to my last edit. Please ask Eridu Dreaming and BorisG and Collect whether we think the page is free of bias.
- 08:4408:44, 29 March 2012 diff hist +884 Talk:Right-wing politics →Why turn the article into a Marxist hit piece?: new section
- 08:4108:41, 29 March 2012 diff hist −34 Right-wing politics No edit summary
- 08:4008:40, 29 March 2012 diff hist +12,265 Right-wing politics No edit summary
