04:4404:44, 23 July 2020diffhist+4,196
Fidesz
Your personal attacks are becoming more ridiculous by the minute. I've been reading Wikipedia for over four years now, and during that time, I've familiarized myself with numerpus Wikipedia policies, including those related to consensus. And virtually every editor on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fidesz#Far_right_designation asides from you and New00100 (Who has flagrantly violated several Wikipedia policies by writing that message on the talkpage) have reached a clear consensus.Tag: references removed
03:1803:18, 23 July 2020diffhist+4,196
Fidesz
Since when is citing reliable sources "POV-pushing"? And I have thoroughly read the discussion itself from beginning to end, and the final consensus was to explicitly classify Fidesz as a far-right party. No other editor asides from you objected.Tag: references removed
03:1403:14, 23 July 2020diffhist+2,093
Hungarian Revolution of 1956
I am not disrupting anything. This page has been stable and without any reverts for moee than 24 hours before you've removed legitimate sourced content without any adequate explanation, and you've utterly failed to properly explain yourself at the talk page itself.
02:5202:52, 23 July 2020diffhist+4,196
Fidesz
Please stop trying to whitewash Fidesz's ideology, KIENGIR. The overwhelming majority of reliable sources on the subject, including a empirical analysis from Open Democracy and a right-leaning South Korean newspaper, explicitly classify Fidesz as a far-right political party.Tag: references removed
02:4102:41, 23 July 2020diffhist+2,093
Hungarian Revolution of 1956
This version has been stable for more than a day before you've resumed edit warring, KIENGIR. You've also carelessly erased several constructive edits made by Davide King in the process. Take it to the talkpage.