Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

12:4412:44, 3 August 2013 diff hist +22‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ Stop warring. Please stop listing Pinskis line as refutation the featured analysis drops a clear pawn for white and actually should be deleted. This is an insult to all things intelligent.
12:4012:40, 3 August 2013 diff hist +1‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ The "others" who mentioned it should be in external links are not strong chess players and only strong players should bother editing this page. Kaufman would agree with me if he was reading this.
12:3512:35, 3 August 2013 diff hist −178‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ This is bull Zimbeck theory is much more comprehensive than Krabbes page. Krabbe is much stronger than all of you and would not say the pinksi line refutes anything. The listed refutation blunders after f5 with cxd7?? Also missing Qb4 which is equal
12:3112:31, 3 August 2013 diff hist +321‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ Undid revision 566954102 by Double sharp (talk)

04:2504:25, 2 August 2013 diff hist +600‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ Undid revision 566809956 by Toccata quarta (talk) Zimbeck only plays in the usa his USCF is 2350. The databases have sold well the analysis of Kaufman is clearly wrong
04:0904:09, 2 August 2013 diff hist +600‎ Halloween Gambit ‎ Undid revision 566806639 by Ihardlythinkso (talk) Zimbeck is a senior master and a world renowned puzzle maker the site was not a blog whatsoever the site is well known