12:4412:44, 3 August 2013diffhist+22
Halloween Gambit
Stop warring. Please stop listing Pinskis line as refutation the featured analysis drops a clear pawn for white and actually should be deleted. This is an insult to all things intelligent.
12:4012:40, 3 August 2013diffhist+1
Halloween Gambit
The "others" who mentioned it should be in external links are not strong chess players and only strong players should bother editing this page. Kaufman would agree with me if he was reading this.
12:3512:35, 3 August 2013diffhist−178
Halloween Gambit
This is bull Zimbeck theory is much more comprehensive than Krabbes page. Krabbe is much stronger than all of you and would not say the pinksi line refutes anything. The listed refutation blunders after f5 with cxd7?? Also missing Qb4 which is equal