This page was nominated for deletion on 18 July, 2005. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 300 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
It may be a good idea to 'subst' all templates on the WP:TS page, because now that page shows up in a whole lot of unrelated categories. Radiant_* 08:54, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
It seems to me that you've fallen into a trap that everyone does at one time or another when doing work of this kind, that of mixing implementation (or system requirements) with user requirements. The whole business about the code here is a system requirement and should be divorced from and considered separately from standards about appearance of the templates.
Before going on, though, it seems that the standard as outlined on the project page is the standard, period, and that discussion is over essentially, considering the fact that people are changing templates to "conform" at present. Is that correct?
Courtland July 4, 2005 14:01 (UTC)
CSS is messed up somewhere. Please have a look at talk:G-caron:
Thanks. —Michael Z. 2006-01-24 03:22 Z
I've made a proposal for converting disambiguation templates from table layouts to CSS-based ones atMediaWiki_talk:Common.css#Improving_template_code. —Michael Z. 2006-11-07 05:32 Z
Does this guideline apply to talk page templates that are not at the top of the talk page, such as ((rfctag))? —harej (talk) 18:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC)