Arbitrators active on this case[edit]

Active:

Recused:

Inactive/away:

To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators.


Question[edit]

Would the outcome of this decision likely touch on the page User:MichaelCPrice/mega2, which is essentially a recreation of the version of the Ebionites page before the removal of the unsourced material, and/or any subsequent attempts to recreate that page in userspace or elsewhere? John Carter 14:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about your question. Are you asking if User:MichaelCPrice/mega2 can remain and continue to be edited? FloNight♥♥♥ 11:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably a better way of phrasing it, yeah. Also, as indicated above, what if anything should be done if the content were recreated on another userpage. I regret to say that, to my eyes anyway, the editor has given the impression of having all the qualities of a true religious fanatic, although in this case of an atheistic tilt, and that as I and others have said I don't think it likely that a decision on this case will necessarily change that aspect of the editor. John Carter 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My initial reaction is that the page should be deleted because we do not provide user space to host poorly sourced content that we do not allow in our articles. I would like to give MichaelCPrice a chance to explain and perhaps remove it himself before we speedy delete it, okay. Let me look into it a bit more and get back with you. FloNight♥♥♥ 15:13, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting the material on the debatable grounds of it being "poorly sourced content" would be to judge content, would it not? I thought arbitration did not judge content? --Michael C. Price talk 19:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think "content" refers to content in the encyclopedia itself. Userspace is a different matter. And at this point, I think the content being "poorly sourced" is probably only semantically arguable, as several parties have already referred extensively to the problems that particular content has. John Carter 19:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to hear from someone with less of a conflict of interest in the matter. --Michael C. Price talk 01:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You will. I am nominating the page for deletion. John Carter 15:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
More