Excuse me, I am the blogger of the rogue feminist snd i don't appreciate being linked to right at the top of this page. You are encouraging cyber bullies to attack me on my blog with slurs. The person who "reported me just called me a "stupid whore." If I am listed at the top, why are none of the incel sites that are encouraging many men who identify as incel to vote on this topic linked there as well? This seems highly biased and unfair against me. I clearly stated in my post that this was NOT a vote and to calmly, rationally engage in the discussion after they had read all the points made and to do research before contributing. Please remove my name from the description. Unless you want to start adding links to incel sites who are encouraging biased people to come here to advocate for this article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Postsocratic (talk • contribs) 21:40, January 11, 2014

Please sign your posts by adding four tildes ( ~~~~ ) after them.

1. I do not see a person's name listed.
2. If you were called a "stupid whore" on Wikipedia, that editor can be blocked. If you were called a "stupid whore" off Wikipedia, that's not within Wikipedia's remit.
3. If you have examples of other recruiting, those can be added, but at this point they aren't really needed-- it will be clear to the closing admin that there has been recruiting all round on this particular issue.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is worth discussing on the admin's noticeboard. I am obviously involved but threatening behaviour should not be tolerated. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised it at ANI. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From what I understand this person was called some names on another site but never on Wikipedia nor was she ever threatened. MalleusMaleficarum1486 (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being warned not to I'd like to say a few words about what this person is claiming. Wikipedia seems to have a policy of linking articles which recruit, it has no particular intent of encouraging any kind of behavior. There are two active sites talking about involuntary celibacy. On one of them there was a single call for posters to try and debate the issue and that was linked in the AFD discussion. The other site on involuntary celibacy has recently been moved, has almost no posters and never mentioned this at all, as witnessed here http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131218053443AArP4t6, http://yourenotalone.info/forum/. There are no multiple incel sites encouraging men to vote here, nothing but a single call for them to try to debate the issue on one of the two sites, in a form of a single comment. Also, please note that almost all of the people who voted in favor of keeping the article were long time editors while four editors who are in favor of deletion are either IP addresses or accounts with no other posts. MalleusMaleficarum1486 (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]