![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2a/Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg/40px-Replacement_filing_cabinet.svg.png) | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
- 117.195.12.222 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Ltiler requesting unblock of this IP. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- ((notaproxy)) already unblocked. Q T C 00:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- 173.172.20.70 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
An unblock request has been sent to unblock-en-l about this IP address. I've been unable to verify that any commonly-used proxy ports are open. --Chris (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- ((notaproxy)). Seems to have been only open for a day or two. Tell them to check their anti-virus anyway. Unblocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- 94.75.243.18 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
User says they have no choice but to use an open proxy. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- They are probably right, as it doesn't look like an open proxy - more like they are using it as part of their promotions job. Someone should have a word about their edits before softblocking the IP or granting IPBE. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:51, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- ((inconclusive)), probably not. I've left a message for the user. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2010 (UTC)