Article has come a long way since December; I've written it with help of User:JimmyBlackwing. It'd be great if some fresh eyes or bots could take a look. My plan is to do a hardcopy copyedit after peer review, then shop it around for some mutual copyediting on Wikipedia's peer review, getting at least 3-4 copyeditors to hang it out to dry. Then, on to making it WP:VG's newest featured article! There are 3 or 4 unresolved questions on the talk page, if anyone knows more about this game. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 02:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit: by the way, is there any way to request your article be visited by a few bots? I love those cleanup changes they make with AWB, but I'm not sure how to submit my article to be reviewed by them. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 02:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I kinda question the gameplay picture in the article. Maybe change it for something else that shows the gameplay mechanics? GamerPro64 (talk) 02:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the game was announced in 1997 and released in 2001, I think a photo of Tom Hall from 1999 might be more appropriate than the current one which is from 2003. Jonathan Hardin' (talk) 15:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a pretty unflattering picture, though. The article would definitely lose some of its visual appeal with that in it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No reason to be judgemental on his looks. I'd prefer the less anachronistic (ha, ha) picture as well. Nczempin (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I meant that it was a bad picture; it's dingy and poorly-lit, and Hall appears to be talking. The one in the article is inarguably the better photograph. It comes down to weighing content against visual appeal; I'm simply leaning toward the latter, in this case. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]