Proposals, December 2023

Bulbophyllum (Asia-Pacific clade)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was sub-cats created.
I recently successfully proposed subcategories for Category:Bulbophyllum (Asia-Pacific clade), but am unsure what I should name the stub templates for the new categories. Any ideas? Thanks, Andumé (talk) 04:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kursk Oblast geography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created as revised.
Currently at 812 articles; I propose we create upmerged templates for each of its districts:

If fewer templates are desired, let me know and I'll chase down possible article counts for each district. Her Pegship (?) 23:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

ETA: I've put in the article counts that I've been able to find, so I amend my proposal to create only templates for those with article counts. Her Pegship (?) 21:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
No opposition, thus I will create templates & cats for these:
and an upmerged template for ((KurchatovskyRU-geo-stub)) until it hits 60. Her Pegship (?) 19:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)three Oktyabrsky Districts in Russia, I'm guessing that disambiguation in the template might be required, thus, I propose further the use of the ISO code for Kursk Oblast, thusly: ((OktyabrskyKRS-geo-stub)). OK? Her Pegship (?) 21:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Pyrausta (moth)-stub/Pyrausta (moth) stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was proposed for renaming.
Calling all entomologists(?) - This is an awkward format for a stub template; I'm not sure the "(moth)" distinction is necessary in the template, though it seems fine in the category name. Before I propose ((pyrausta (moth)-stub)) for renaming to ((pyrausta-stub)), does anyone here have an opinion? Thanks. Her Pegship (?) 18:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Category