The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Joachim Helbig[edit]

Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because I feel it may be close. Please let me know how to improve this article further. Comments, suggestions are appreciated. MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded this a little. I think it is clearer now. MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's funny, you're right. I replaced machine with aircraft. Unfortunately the type is not specified in any of my sources. MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my sources just state that he was injured in a motocycle accident. MisterBee1966 (talk) 20:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point, I expanded this a little MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Comments

doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Helbig and his crew, the remaining memebers of 4th squadron did not MisterBee1966 (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
doneMisterBee1966 (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
don't know! My sources say nothing about his private life MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am concerned that no effort has been made to use the 2 volume LG 1 history by Peter Taghon, ISBN 3-925480-88-9 and 3-925480-85-4, to resolve some of these issues regarding LG 1's activities in '44-45. And exactly what unit Helbig was assigned to in September 1939. And the almost total lack of personal information, to include when Helbig got his commission, does not meet the standard of reasonably complete at this level and for this period. One or the other might be acceptable since this isn't a FAC, but both together do not incline me to support a promotion.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did consult Peter Taghon books (note they are two 1936 to 1942 and 1942 to 1945) of LG 1. Interestingly Joachim Helbig is not mentioned much in the early years and not at all with respect to the Polish campaign. I will verify again how much additional information can be extracted for 1944. Both books render no information on his personal life. So be it MisterBee1966 (talk) 09:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad that you had access to the Taghon books, but I'm surprised that it didn't have more on Helbig considering he became their commander later. I'd still like to know what unit he was actually with in September '39 as Kampfaufklärungs could be the Stab (Staff) aircraft at Gruppe or Geschwader level or a long-range reconnaissance Staffel. I think that there was one in LG 2 and independent Staffeln.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He was an observer during the Polish campaign, not the pilot MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's what the sources claim (Kurowski). MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have answered on your talk page. Dapi89 (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote:

After completing his training as an observer and aerial gunner in April 1937, he was posted with III. Gruppe (3rd Group) Kampfgeschwader (Bomber Wing) 152 "Hindenburg" in Schwerin. III./KG 152 "Hindenburg" became II. Group of Lehrgeschwader 1 (1st Demonstration Wing) on 1 November 1938

Is this not clear MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm affraid not. On the article it is listed he commanded I./LG 1. What does that mean? To me this means I Gruppe. Which first Group? There were two. I.(Kampf) and I. (Zerstorer). I am confused as to which unit he commanded. Dapi89 (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Point taken! It should be I.(Kampf)/LG 1 now fixed MisterBee1966 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "On 23 January 1944 LG 1 sunk the HMS Janus with a Henschel Hs 293 glider bomb and again damages the Jervis severly for the loss of 11 aircraft." Tense switching, and please clarify the phrase about the loss of aircraft: were they lost with the Jervis, or shot down in the process of sinking the Jervis?
  • "He was taken prisoner of war (POW) by the Americans and was taken to the Sennelager POW camp from which he escaped on 9 June." Please clarify how he was taken prisoner: shot down, gave himself up, etc., and how and why he escaped instead of waiting to be released with the end of the war.
  • Can you do any elaborating on his life after the war? Sure it isn't as important, but one line on 30 years of life is quite a bit too little.
I understand the sourcing problems, but would really like to see improvement in the last comment. – Joe N 22:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are tons of articles out there that cannot satisfy the completeness requirement of even GA-class for lack of available sources. I know this all too well; I've written a number of them. It would be really nice to be able to get them upgraded, but it will never happen unless I dig into archival information and then publish a book so as to satisfy WP:V. MisterBee has, IMO, hit the limits of the available information unless he can access issues of Jägerblatt or something similar. And private life aside there are a number of unanswered questions that I and a few others have posed above that have not been answered regarding his military career and activities. Enough so that I cannot support this as an A-class article in terms of completeness.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.