This page provides a list of all articles available at PlanetMath in the following topic:
- 26-XX Real functions.
This list will be periodically updated. Each entry in the list has three fields:
- PM : The first field is the link to the PlanetMath article, along with the article's object ID.
- WP : The second field is either a "guessed" link to a correspondingly named Wikipedia article, produced by the script which generated the list, or one or more manually entered links to the corresponding Wikipedia articles on the subject.
- Status : The third field is the status field, which explains the current status of the entry. The recommended status entries are:
Status |
means PM article
|
N |
not needed
|
A |
adequately covered
|
C |
copied
|
M |
merged
|
NC |
needs copying
|
NM |
needs merging
|
- Please update the WP and Status fields as appropriate.
- if the WP field is correct please remove the qualifier "guess".
- If the corresponding Wikipedia article exists, but the link to it is wrong, please fix the link.
- If you copy or merge an article from PlanetMath, please update the WP and Status fields for that entry.
- If you have any comments, for example, thoughts on how the PlanetMath article compares to the corresponding Wikipedia article(s), please place such comments on a new indented line following the entry. Comments of this kind are very valuable.
Don't forget to include the relevant template if you copy over text or feel like an external link is warranted
- ((planetmath|id=|title=)) for copied over text
- ((planetmath reference|id=|title=)) for an external link
See the main page for examples and usage criteria.
One can use the web-based program Pmform to convert PlanetMath articles to the Wikipedia format. As a side benefit, this tool will place the PlanetMath template for you.
- Nice article, but some time in the future maybe more can be said about its history and applications. Oleg Alexandrov | talk 01:21, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- PM has a lot of stuff, I doubt we need that. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 23:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- But with lots of care. The WP article has lots of stuff which the PM one does not, while PM has just very little stuff which WP does not. Oleg Alexandrov | talk 05:42, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 10:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 23:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 10:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 13:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Made redirect to Simple function - AdamSmithee 13:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The plain latin title needs be the main article, the other one redirectOleg Alexandrov | talk 05:47, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 00:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 00:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeekc 11:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeekc 11:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeekc 11:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 14:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 00:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Jeekc 11:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 14:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 00:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This proof, going first through the Bolzano theorem special case by interval halving, is more intuitive IMO AdamSmithee 13:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 20:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- CryptoDerk 07:02, Feb 3, 2005 (UTC)
- AdamSmithee 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- On PM they also talk about signum function for complex argument, but that is reduntant I would think. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 18:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Could lead to reorganisation and better wording. Otherwise, the info is mostly in there AdamSmithee 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- PM: double series, id=8731new! -- WP guess: double series -- Status:
- PM: sinc is L^2, id=7697new! -- WP guess: sinc is L^2 -- Status:
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 14:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I created this article, with examples and pictures. Oleg Alexandrov 01:22, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 14:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- PM: C^n, id=6701 -- WP guess: C^n -- Status:
- PM: C^n norm, id=6702 -- WP guess: C^n norm -- Status:
- Oleg Alexandrov 22:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov 22:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 23:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 11:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AdamSmithee 13:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- PM: absolutely continuous on [0,1 versus absolutely continuous on [\varepsilon, 1] for every \varepsilon >0], id=8300new! -- WP guess: [[absolutely continuous on [0,1] versus absolutely continuous on [\varepsilon, 1] for every \varepsilon >0]] -- Status:
- Mikkalai 05:02, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merged into convex function. Mikkalai 05:02, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Oleg Alexandrov 20:38, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- They have quite some similarities. Oleg Alexandrov 19:14, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Mikkalai 05:11, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- PM: Hessian form, id=6708 -- WP guess: Hessian form -- Status:
- by User:Daniele.tampieri. 03:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 17:13, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- (not by me). Oleg Alexandrov 22:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a proof. Oleg Alexandrov 22:43, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]