The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior, Ocaasi, Sadads

sign up for monthly delivery

The months of June and July have been full of exciting developments with the Wikipedia Library. We're really growing our partnerships, our team, and our global reach. Read on to find out more!

Library highlights[edit]

Access partnerships[edit]

Global expansion[edit]

Outreach[edit]

American Library Association Annual Conference[edit]

Jake (Ocaasi) and Patrick (The Interior) travelled to Las Vegas, Nevada, for the 2014 ALA Annual. This conference of over 25,000 librarians, publishers, and information professionals presented TWL with multiple venues to make some progress on our initiatives. Some highlights from the weekend:

  • An editathon at the University of Nevada Las Vegas' Lied Library attracted a good group of Rare Books and Manuscripts librarians. Organized by Merrilee and Kosboot, this was an excellent opportunity to discuss not only the practicalities of editing the encyclopedia, but also how and where librarians can contribute in a manner that addresses the WP community's concerns about Conflict of Interest. As these librarians are the guardians of some of North America's finest collections of primary documents, there is great potential for collaboration and improvement of WP content.
  • Ocaasi participated in a formal presentation at Caesars Palace alongside members of OCLC, Rutgers University, and Montana State University on various aspects of the Wikipedia/library interface, with a focus on how academic libraries at higher learning institutions can create fruitful partnerships with Wikipedia and its editors. Take a look at the slideshow: Wikipedia and Libraries: Increasing Your Library's Visibility
  • An important focus of the trip was to take advantage of the large number of publishers and database providers manning the booths in the Exhibitor's Hall. We identified some of the most desirable products for our editors, and targeted those companies and institutions. Our newly designed, color one-sheet flyers: Access Partnerships, Impact Metrics, and Visiting Scholars were placed into many hands.
  • We had in person talks with numerous publishers from ALA, including post-conference email follow-ups and phone calls. We talked with EBSCO, ProQuest, Elsevier, SAGE, Gale, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Intelex Past Masters, Adam Matthew, E-Libro Spanish ebooks and others. We also dropped by Credo, Cengage, and JSTOR to say thank you for our existing partnerships.
  • OCLC and Merrilee Proffitt wrote a great blog to their network about TWL and the ALA experience: [1]
  • We noted an encouraging change of tone with regards to how the library world perceives Wikipedia. Mostly gone are the criticisms and disdain that characterized professional librarian's views toward the project in the past. Librarians and archivists from diverse areas of the library world expressed their interest in bringing their institution and Wikipedia together, and many admitted how heavily they use the encyclopedia in their reference work. Publishers we approached were at the least intrigued, and sometimes extremely interested, in the concept of the Wikipedia Library. TWL hopes to have a large presence at the next ALA Annual, held in San Francisco in 2015, and we encourage Books & Bytes readers to join in with ideas for how this should take shape, put together editathons and presentations, and hopefully attend themselves!

Jake and Patrick also visited the WMF in June where we met new ED, Lila Tretikov: she was excited about the work TWL is doing and wants to see a whole lot more of it!

Final grant report highlights[edit]

We turned in our final grant renewal report to the Wikimedia Foundation on meta. We are excitedly working with the Wikimedia Foundation to make sure that our next steps from our report become actualized. But in the meantime, we thought we would like to highlight the executive summary:

The Wikipedia Library
June 2013 - June 2014
Total unique users1,940
Total accounts2,924
Total value$1,263,011
Users this round864
Accounts this round1,005
Value this round$714,010
Visiting scholars5
Library tech tools2
Coordinators14
Global branches3
Grant amount$28,700

Tech[edit]

Coordinators: What are they up to?[edit]

Spotlight: Working with Wikipedia to Bring History Facts to Light[edit]

"Working with Wikipedia to bring history facts to light" by Simon Tushingham, previously ran on the Newspaper Archive blog and another version at the WMF Blog

I have a History degree from the University of Cambridge and Wikipedia has always been a way for me to explore my interest in Indian and local history. When I got access to The British Newspaper Archive through the Wikipedia Library, I saw it as an opportunity to explore one of Salford’s local history mysteries.

— Simon Tushingham

Sir James Farmer[edit]

I discovered the mystery by speaking to several people who had been apprentices at the Sir James Farmer Norton & Co Ltd engineering firm at the Adelphi Ironworks in Salford.

None of them could really tell me anything about Sir James Farmer, though they knew lots about the products the company had manufactured. These were sold worldwide and many are still being used and resold now. Some of the products were truly innovative, such as a fast printing press.

The only information they really knew about Farmer was that he was once Mayor of Salford. Although the company did produce a celebratory booklet for an anniversary, there really doesn’t seem to have been much written about the man who started it all.

Starting Sir James Farmer’s Wikipedia article[edit]

Because of his impact on my friends and our community, I suspected that Sir James Farmer may have been one of the more notable of the many self-made, often world-changing, engineering men who inhabited Manchester, Salford and the surrounding areas in the 19th century. He needed a Wikipedia article!

Wikipedia’s model for article development supports the ‘from little acorns…’ approach. If I could start an article about Farmer, then perhaps at some time in the future someone might find more information and add to it.

Wikipedia also has limitations. Inaccessible verifiable information usually means no article – it is meant to be an encyclopaedia, after all, so there needs to be some type of public and reliably documented conversation to show that it is of interest to the public. I couldn’t use the primary source material available at a couple of archives and there wasn’t really much else that I could find without trawling through microfilms.

Using The British Newspaper Archive[edit]

Enter The British Newspaper Archive! Forget spending days, probably weeks, twiddling at a film reader, I could get access to the most important information about Farmer with one simple search.

In the space of a couple of hours, most of which was spent being pleasantly distracted by other news articles surrounding the ones about Farmer, I’d gathered enough material to justify an article.

The man is now recognised on a major educational project that gets millions of viewers. I’ve planted that acorn and given him some of the recognition he deserves. Hopefully, given time, much more can be said about him and his company.

Sir James Farmer’s obituary[edit]

Here’s an example of what I was able to find at The British Newspaper Archive: Farmer’s obituary was published in the Manchester Times in 1892 and included an illustration of him.

Further reading[edit]

There's lots of great digital library information online. Check out these neat resources for more library exploring.



Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of Books & Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, The Interior (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Suggestions.