< November 19 November 21 >

November 20

Template:2009 NCAA Division I FCS independents football standings/doc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. plicit 23:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used on the main template page since yesterday. A doc page for a standings template isn't necessary. All categories and information are going to be edited and displayed on the main template space. A doc page is counterintuitive for a template like this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ted

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox created by blocked sockpuppet. Redundant to ((Seth MacFarlane)). – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 05:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).