The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attitude Era series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar for the Attitude Era, part of the History of WWE. Doesn't seem much of a "series", content more suitable for a navbox which we already have ((WWE)). Nigej (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was unused as somebody removed them from articles quietly. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was the one who removed it, because it was added by one person without discussion and is not a good navbox, especially the use of a sidebar for such a short and narrow topic list. Sidebars are for major top-level stuff. Doesn't add anything to be articles. delete oknazevad (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you, one person, removed it... without discussion? Hmm. "Sidebars are for major top-level stuff" - citation needed. "Doesn't add anything to be articles" - it adds a sidebar to the article to navigate to associated articles within the topic with ease. There are additional articles to be created which would pass GNG that would also be included. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor A added something, Editor B removed it. That is the cycle of WP:BRD. They don't need a discussion in order to remove it, as the short time it was on the article is not enough to establish a consensus for it. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor B removed every instance of it from the articles without even informing Editor A. Very bad form that. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor B is allowed to do that. The fault lies with Editor A who restored his changes. WP:BRD says "Don't restore your changes ..." Nigej (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The seventh, eighth, and ninth words of that policy are "an optional method". So, I'm allowed to do that. 👍 All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: It's now used on articiles, and i think we should keep it as its useful for Attiude Era articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TzarN64 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing directly related to the Attitude Era exists other than its mainspace. These are all about WWF, now WWE events, and directly related to the WWF/WWE. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Literally all the pages linked are things which occurred during the "Attitude Era". Has one been included which doesn't? Please tell me which one. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That's true, but the question is whether they're all part of a "series" of articles. To me this is more a parent article and a number of child articles, when a navbox is often preferred. Nigej (talk) 09:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Convert to bottom navbox if wanted. There is no reason for it clutter to the top of the page, and on some pages it's used as the second infobox. Gonnym (talk) 09:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The actual Attitude Era article itself sucks badly and doesn't even define the time period. I've been calling attention to it for years now, but no one ever seems to care. The main article should be vastly improved before wasting time with a "template." 130.45.24.168 (talk) 08:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This discussion is proving my general distaste for templates being added to articles following beign TfDed as unused right; the "organic" status quo was that it was not in use, and no strong reason to deviate from that status quo has been provided, as the sole keep !vote is a near-textbook example of several arguments to avoid. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, sidebars are suboptimal for this type of navigation because the crowd other right-floating content like images and infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 21:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ETEN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template not used anywhere. Doesn't have any parameters. Existence of this template can easily be avoided by directly using the template on which this one is based: the ((editnotice))-template. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Related: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Entertainment theater. Same creator, appears to not understand what this web site is about. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Per the MFD discussion I'm fairly sure that this is supposed to be an editnotice for the entertainment theatre. This should have been left until that discussion concluded, if that page is deleted this can be G8'd, if kept then this should be kept. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I didn't notice it's related to the other page they created. I had just gone through the user's creation logs, and noticed this template not being used anywhere. If you prefer then I don't mind you speedy procedurally closing this to await the outcome of the MFD. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough, my comment wasn't intended as a criticism of your nomination, it was more intended as a note on how this should be handled, I think I worded it in slightly the wrong tone. Waiting for the MFD to conclude sounds like the best idea since the fate of this page is tied to the fate of the Entertainment theatre. I expect this is moot discussion really since it's snowing quite heavily at MFD. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused and redundant. Stifle (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Wait until Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Entertainment theater concludes. Perhaps it can be bundled into the MfD? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Creator has now been indefinitely blocked. Stifle (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Stink bomb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Delete Since everyone’s got their own dumb trouting template these days:

The trouting thing was always stupid but now we’re just getting into Reductio ad absurdum. Dronebogus (talk) 01:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Below is the actual Stink bomb template. The image and text above are not associated with it. It comes across as misleading to post in the manner above, because casual readers may incorrectly assume that the above is the Stink bomb template, when it is not. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The actual template
Whack! Pee-ew, you've been stink bombed! Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. Sent using ((Stink bomb))

• Keep – The nomination seems based entirely upon subjective personal opinion, vis-à-vis WP:IDONTLIKEIT. No reason relative to Wikipedia:Deletion policy has been advanced to justify its deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I don't think this is useful for collaboration. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If really needed (and it isn't), ((Trout)) should be enough. This isn't a personal template a user places on their own page, but something that is placed on someone else's page, as such a personal preference isn't a factor here and a standard template should be used. --Gonnym (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. 1 or none, not dozens of the same. Nigej (talk) 06:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep until a valid deletion rationale is provided. It has transclusions, which means that people are using it. It is well-formed. It is properly documented and categorized. What is the problem, aside from the obvious smell? – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:TfD "Reasons to delete a template 2. The template is redundant to a better-designed template." Nigej (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Ha ha, well, it's arguable that the Stink bomb template is better-designed compared to the trout template. For example, the former has a nice border, whereas the latter does not. Also of note is that Template:OverdoneStinkBomb is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 11. Not sure why this wasn't mentioned here before. Lastly, users here are stating that the trout template is "enough" and "1 or none", but this does not take several other similar templates into consideration, such as Template:Minnow, Template:Whale, Template:Self-whale, Template:Chips, Template:OverdoneTrout, Template:Multitrout, Template:Whalemeat and perhaps others. So, why do such templates have to suddenly be only based upon animals that live in water? North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  "Redundant" in this context usually means that the template performs exactly the same function, such as creating a given link or text formatting. This template is not redundant in that way; it is substantively different from ((trout)) and other templates in the "advising editors that they did something dumb" family of templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It's a bit like changing "why did the chicken cross the road" to "why did the duck cross the road" and claiming its a diffferent joke. Nigej (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree with Jonesey95 and disagree with Nigej on this point; variation and creativity is a good thing, as are options for users. Why on earth should everything be "allowed" to exist in only one way? Makes no sense for all such templates to have to be based upon animals that live in water. How absurdly arbitrary. See also Template:Small Overdone Trout; well, this one is on land. Then there's Template:Colonel as well, another land-based "that's silly" template. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Northamerica1000: I honestly think a lot of the trout templates are excessive. I like ((trout)) and ((minnow)), and maybe even ((whale)) on occasion, but wouldn't object to the deletion of the rest -- particularly the ones which put images that are rather gross on others user talk pages. Whale has existed since 2010 and minnow and trout since 2007; stuff like ((Whalemeat)) and ((Multitrout)) is much more recent. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Elli: I respect your right to have an opinion, but that's the whole problem here, all of the delete !votes are entirely subjective, lacking any merit relative to deletion policies. Thus far, it's been all about WP:IDONTLIKEIT here. Sorry, but that's my impression here thus far. So, let's say that I don't like someone's user page, but it's not in violation of any policies; would it then be appropriate to then nominate it for deletion at WP:MFD simply because I don't like it? No, that would be inappropriate, at least in my view. So why is such subjectivity embraced at TfD? At any rate, you don't like some of the imagery, but keep in mind that Wikipedia is not censored. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I understand that Wikipedia isn't censored, but that doesn't mean we need to make it easier to plop things generally deemed to be unpleasant on other's userpages with no clear benefit. Yes, this is fundamentally an IDONTLIKEIT issue -- but if most editors don't like a template, and it doesn't serve an important purpose, then generally it should be deleted? Otherwise that would be an argument to allow thousands of variations ("you've been gorilla'd", "you've been eaten by a tiger", etc) because "the only argument to delete is IDONTLIKEIT"). Elli (talk | contribs) 00:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Elli: I get what you're saying, but "thousands" of such templates are not being created. You state above "things generally deemed to be unpleasant", but that's all subjective. For example, take a look at the Whaling article (if you dare). This is slightly an apples and oranges comparison in comparing an article to a template, but the argument has significant merit as well. There are plenty of images there that some would deem as unpleasant, but the images are there to provide context. Plus, stink bombs aren't really that disturbing, are they? At least an image of a prank stink bomb is not, in my view. Harmless, really. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough. I don't feel too strongly on this, but I wanted to provide my rationale here so you can understand where I'm coming from. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Regarding the other templates you mentioned, well that is plainly WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Gonnym (talk) 06:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Actually, it's not plain. WP:OSE is entirely about articles only, whereas WP:IDONTLIKEIT is about content in general. Go ahead and compare the two. Notice how the latter uses terms such as "kinds of information", "content" and "images", while the former is wholly about articles in entirety, without any mention of other types of content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• This is the most overly elaborate discussion on virtual stink bombs ever. Dronebogus (talk) 00:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Enough now. Stifle (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The template nanespace should not be polluted with dumb jokes. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R from alternative scientific name/plant (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since Template:R from alternative scientific name was modified to use a module here. Gonnym (talk) 07:00, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and comment at #Template:R to monotypic taxon/aux. Nigej (talk) 05:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R from monotypic taxon/aux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since Template:R from monotypic taxon was modified to use a module here. Gonnym (talk) 07:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and comment at #Template:R to monotypic taxon/aux. Nigej (talk) 05:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R to monotypic taxon/aux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused since Template:R to monotypic taxon was modified to use a module here. Gonnym (talk) 07:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• All three above can be deleted given that they are unused now. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ISRCOTW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused banner related to the Israel Collaboration of the Week. Nigej (talk) 07:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Dead idea. Gonnym (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add also Template:ISRCOTW article. Gonnym (talk) 07:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both as Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel/COTW is marked as historical. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R to subpage/doc support (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An unused duplicate of Template:R to subpage/doc. Gonnym (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Project portals (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused portal related template. Gonnym (talk) 07:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete apparnent failed test from 2009. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Box portal skeleton/doc/box-header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unlinked sub-page. While this is listed as a sub-page of the /docs it really isn't documentation at all. Template:Box portal skeleton#Usage has an example. Gonnym (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an apparent failed test from 2013 (associated with this test edit). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Speedy deleted per WP:G7: the only substantial content of the page was added by its author, that being me. Outdated template that isn't needed anymore. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ecology Portal New Intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused decade old "new" portal template. Since its creator is active in that portal, likely also out of date. Gonnym (talk) 07:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FloridaCOTM article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Relates to Florida collaboration of the month Nigej (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I literally have no recollection of creating this fifteen years ago, nor any idea what purpose it served. BD2412 T 07:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and creator. Gonnym (talk) 08:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Footer Davis Cup Champions Tennis Team Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox. List of Davis Cup champions winning teams. Seems unfinished since it only goes to 1959. Difficult to imagine how such a navbox could be useful, and as it's basically article content. Nigej (talk) 07:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Former Treehouse original programming (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of ((Former Treehouse TV original series)) Nigej (talk) 07:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Former Cartoon Network original series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of ((Former Cartoon Network original programming)) Nigej (talk) 07:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Military Vehicle of France (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:French Army and Navy Vehicle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:French Air Force and Navy Vehicle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:French Air Force and Army Vehicle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2008. Some in this series have been repurposed as navboxes eg ((French Army Vehicle)). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Archive 19#French nav boxes where they discussed. Nigej (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FrenchArmyTree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2008 and seems to have been replaced with File:Armée du Nord.png, File:Armée des côtes de la Rochelle.png etc Nigej (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Speedy deleted per WP:G7: the only substantial content of the page was added by its author, that being me. Outdated template that isn't needed anymore. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk)

• Template:Handball kit home and away (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused wrapper for ((Handball kit)). ((Infobox handball club)) uses "Handball kit" directly. Nigej (talk) 08:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'm nominated it as speedy delete as author of the template. I made a mistake to create this template 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hebrew calendar tomorrow in time zone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. ((Hebrew calendar today in time zone)) is used. Nigej (talk) 08:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Henderson family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Family tree for someone we don't have an article for. More for personal interest I suspect. Nigej (talk) 08:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• @Nigej: Yes, this is true. It is on my user page and orginally an experiment in developing a tree. I've modified the template to be article specific. --Greg Henderson (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Netherzone's comment at Talk:Alexander D. Henderson Jr.#Request Edit J. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If they really wanted a tree for their page, there is no reason they can't use the ahnentafel template. Painting17 (talk) 06:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Honolulu County, Hawaii. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Honolulu County, Hawaii topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Honolulu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Honolulu County, Hawaii topics with Template:Honolulu.
Navbox with no transclusions. ((Honolulu)) seems to be preferred, which contains a link to this navbox. Content could perhaps be added there. Nigej (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose ((Honolulu)) is for the urban city area. There is another Honolulu County template that it should merge to, ((Honolulu County, Hawaii)). The county is coterminous with the island of Oahu, so there is no reason for the entire island to be covered by the urbanized area of Honolulu template -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Template:Honolulu County, Hawaii. I would have agreed with the merge, seeing as how the articles themselves already transclude Template:Honolulu even though they aren't linked in it, but the IP makes a good point that there is already another Honolulu County template, which should be the merge target. Gonnym (talk) 09:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:House of Bourbon, 1700-1833 (Philip V-Ferdinand VI Arms) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and basically a duplicate of ((House of Bourbon (Spain))) with a different coat of arms. There are other similar ones too, like ((House of Bourbon, 1761-1931 (Charles III-Alfonso XIII Arms))), which are used. Doesn't seem a good idea since the templates are gradually changing independently of each other. Nigej (talk) 08:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (1995) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (1996) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (1997) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (1999) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2001) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2003) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2005) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2007) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2009) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2011) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2013) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2015) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2017) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (2019) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Chinese Academy of Engineering members (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per discussions like Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 17#Template:FBA 1927. These fail much of WP:NAVBOX. The members elected in a particular year have nothing really in common, no more so than any other arbitrary grouping of the members. Articles for one member almost never mention those elected in the same year. We have List of members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering etc and Category:Members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering which are more than adequate. I have excluded the ((Founding members of the Chinese Academy of Engineering)) from 1994 which may be a notable group. Nigej (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SCOTUSterms (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by ((SCOTUScaselists)) which has a line "By recent term" Nigej (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SCOTUS term for US volume (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It was removed from ((SCOTUSLinks)) in 2016 and seems to be unused. Nigej (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. MZMcBride made that change at Special:Diff/753610899. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 22:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Seoul American Football Association (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and is just a list of universities. There's no content on the Seoul American Football Association. Indeed there's minimal content on American football in South Korea, see Category:American football in South Korea Nigej (talk) 12:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Shield volcano location map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was used at Shield volcano and List of shield volcanoes from where it was removed in Jan 2013 with the comment "template is currently broken" Nigej (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:This date in recent years/2006Rev (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:This date in recent years/2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates related to ((This date in recent years)) which produces a table at articles like February 15 (currently covering 2022 back to 2013) Nigej (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 22. ✗plicit 13:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tom_DeLay_series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tone-th (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as a result of this Tfd Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 9#Template:C-nl. Nigej (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UAAP roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. ((UAAPplayer)) and ((UAAP roster header)) are used but with the generic ((Basketball roster footer)). See eg 2016 FEU Tamaraws men's basketball team#Roster. This template was created a number of years later than the other two. Nigej (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Shooting WR SK75 Junior Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RTMIX Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RTMIX Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RT Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RT Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RTMIX Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RTMIX Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AP60 Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AP60 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60Dec Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60Dec Junior Men Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60Dec Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FP Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FP Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR3X40 Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR3X40 Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR3X40 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PR Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PRDec Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PRDec Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR RFP Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR RFP Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR RFP Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125 Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125 Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125 Junior Men Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SPM Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SPM Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STP Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STP Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125 Junior Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125 Junior Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125 Junior Men Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125 Junior Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RTMIX Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RT Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RT Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RTMIX Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 50RTMIX Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300FR3X40 Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300FR3X40 Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300FR60PR Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X20 Men CISM Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X20 Men ISSF Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60 Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR CFP Men CISM Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150 Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150 Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150 Men Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR3X40 Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR3X40 Men Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PR Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PRDec Men Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR FR60PRDec Men Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR RFP Men Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR APMIX Junior Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR APMIX Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR ARMIX Junior Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR ARMIX Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SKMIX Junior Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SKMIX Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TRMIX Junior Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TRMIX Junior Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT20 Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT20 Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT20MIX Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RT20MIX Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RTW Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 10RTW Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300FR60PR Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X20 Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X20 Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X40 Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR 300STR3X40 Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60W Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60W Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR AR60W Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT120 Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150W Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR DT150W Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR R3X40 Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR R3X40 Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR R3X40 Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR R60PR Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR R60PR Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK75 Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK75 Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125W Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125W Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SK125W Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR SP Women ISSF Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STR3X20 Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STR3X20 Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STR60PR Women Individual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR STR60PR Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR75 Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR75 Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR75 Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125W Women Final (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125W Women Qualification (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shooting WR TR125W Women Teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Template:Shooting WR 10RT20 Junior Women Individual and related shooting record templates at which a number of unused and single-use shooting record templates were substituted (where necessary) and deleted. This is a further list of other related unused and single-use shooting record templates for which I would suggest the same outcome. Nigej (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RPM Productions titleholders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox-style template for listing the winners of the beauty contests run by RPM Productions. As with all this style of template, the 8 winners have nothing in common and the template is intended to be purely decorative. Thankfully this one is unused. Nigej (talk) 18:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:S-line/CFR Intercity right/606 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/CFR Intercity right/607 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/CFR Intercity right/608 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. New S-line templates created two weeks ago and still unused. Module:Adjacent stations should be used instead, so these templates are not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia left/9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Metrovalencia right/9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metrovalencia lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metrovalencia stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Metrovalencia color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. New S-line templates created three weeks ago and still unused. Module:Adjacent stations should be used instead, so these templates are not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Module:Adjacent stations/Metrovalencia was now created. I'm merging the rest of the set to this nomination. If anyone has an issue with that, let me know. Gonnym (talk) 07:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Templates now superseded by module. Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RX2 event report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and probably unfinished infobox-style template. Relates to events like 2017 World RX of Hockenheim, all of which use ((Infobox World RX event report)). Not obvious why it was created when the other already existed. Nigej (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Reproductive Rights Sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sidebar from 2011. Perhaps ((Human reproductive health)) does the job. Nigej (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Editnotices/Page/Golden Raspberry Awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The page disputes that prompted this template's creation at this point seem to have been resolved over a decade ago. While there is nothing inherently wrong with reminders to avoid OR, as far as I can tell there is nothing particular about recent edits to this page that justify a special and unique edit notice. Yaksar (let's chat) 18:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• As I've noticed the creator has since been blocked, I will be more blunt and less polite -- this template was created by a former and now blocked admin in order to scare other users from making legitimate changes that they disagreed with. The most egregious part of the template was later removed, but we are left with this unnecessary remaining one.--Yaksar (let's chat) 18:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There are way too many of these and this is a typical example, simply repeating policy/guidelines. If it's so important it should be on every page. Nigej (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Research Labs of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Research Institutions of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navboxes related to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. The first is unused and mentions two labs. The second exists at one of those but is empty. Both from the same user. Nigej (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hamid Al Rifaie family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Unused family tree template created in 2010. It has only one blue-linked person, whose article does not appear to need a family tree. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No obvious reason this man needs a family-tree more than anyone else. Lots of non-notable people mentioned. Nigej (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Mountain West Conference color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mountain West Conference font color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions or documentation. These appear to have been replaced by Module:College color. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Land Rover North American timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused timeline for Land Rover North America. No article on that topic and it's probably too similar to ((Land Rover vehicles)) to be useful. No updated since it was created. Nigej (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Least Intense Pacific typhoon seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. We have ((Top 10 Most Intense Pacific typhoon season)) but perhaps the least intense seasons are not of interest. Nigej (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:List of defunct airlines/countries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An experiment with a different style to ((List of defunct airlines)) but the other seems to be preferred. Nigej (talk) 19:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Deadliest Atlantic hurricane seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. We have ((Deadliest Atlantic hurricanes)) which covers a longer period. Nigej (talk) 20:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).