The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Same-sex marriage map North America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant as the map featured on this template is transcluded as a file, not through template space. Map is used on LGBT rights in the Americas and Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas. Unnecessary transclusion through template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Victory ship power 8500 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused ship infobox text template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ticonderoga class cruiser power (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused ship infobox text style template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek left/Tanjung Priok-Jakarta Kota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek right/Maja-Tanah Abang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek right/Parung Panjang-Tanah Abang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek right/Rangkasbitung-Tanah Abang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek right/Serpong-Tanah Abang (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KRL Jabodetabek right/Tanjung Priok-Jakarta Kota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/XA left/9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused S-line templates and unlikely to be used since the S-line format is being phased out. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't know what these were replaced with. The KRL templates aren't recently created so it seems it's safer to assume these were replaced with something, though there are other KRL templates that are still in-use. The XA template is pretty recent so might be worth keeping it for a bit longer. Frietjes has been converting Chinese S-line templates, so this might be taken care of. Gonnym (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/XA left/9 can now be deleted as the entire set was replaced by a module. Gonnym (talk) 20:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Public transport in Hong Kong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to Template:Transport in Hong Kong which already covers direct topics about Transportation in Hong Kong. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Medal "For the Capture of Berlin" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "For the Defence of Moscow" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "For the Defence of the Soviet Transarctic" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "For the Liberation of Prague" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "For the Liberation of Warsaw" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "In Commemoration of the 250th Anniversary of Leningrad" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "In Commemoration of the 800th Anniversary of Moscow" (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "To a Partisan of the Patriotic War" 1st class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Medal "To a Partisan of the Patriotic War" 2nd class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused medal templates that link to the articles for the medals and the file image of the medals are already transcluded on articles across Wikipedia. These are unnecessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge all of them to Template:Medal Display/other where they should be indicated -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If these are merged into the template suggested above and not deleted, a follow up nom should handle Category:Soviet military decorations and medals templates so there is consistency with Soviet medal usages. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 05:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:New York City FC II squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only two links. Fails navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rlink2 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; there are enough links; I updated the template Joeykai (talk) 21:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of those players that have articles and that don't are not for this team. They're for New York City FC. A different team. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These players are all playing for New York City FC II literally right now [1] Joeykai (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The players are listed also at Template:New York City FC squad. I have a feeling that a player can't be in the "current" squad of two teams at the same time. Gonnym (talk) 22:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Under MLS Next Pro rules, yes they can. It wasn't the case before with B-teams playing in the USL, but as Next Pro is a development league players can freely transfer between the two at will. Consider it to be like how a Premier League team's under-23 academy players can be called up at any time for the senior squad, then drop straight back to the academy after the match. Falastur2 ^Talk 22:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 19:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - insufficient links to merit a navbox. Restore if that changes. GiantSnowman 19:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: first of all, apologies for the delayed response. Unfortunately I've got a lovely case of sciatica right now and this is the first time in over a week that I've felt capable of sitting up for long enough to so much as read the message, let alone respond to it. Please note that the template I made was provisional - at the time the team was still being put together. There were only a few names on it because the club hadn't signed the players. They have now, so this template can be bulked out. What's more, the team has played a competitive match, meaning all players involved are eligible now for Wikipedia articles so those red links can start going away. I can't promise to create all of the articles overnight, because I put effort into what I do (read: it takes me hours to even write one stub-class article) and, as mentioned, I have sciatica. However, if you can wait a few weeks you should see this template looking a lot better. Falastur2 ^Talk 22:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Zelenaluzhskaya style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Module:Adjacent stations/Minsk Metro has the style. Gonnym (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. ✗plicit 11:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Nepali Congress/meta/symbol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I strongly oppose your move. Please see the use of Template:Bharatiya Janata Party/meta/symbol and many such others. Let me use this now. I was busy for my exams few days from now. Due to this, the template was left unused.JayMithila (talk) 06:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn. This template has three transclusions at this writing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 12. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2016_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2017_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2018_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2019_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2020_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2021_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2022_in_Sri_Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Kanpur Metro color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions after I restored all uses of this new template (created in good faith) to use the updated ((rail color box)), which makes use of Module:Adjacent stations. We are moving toward that latter module, not away from it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Module:Adjacent stations/Kanpur Metro exists and it and the associated templates should be used. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).