- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Single-use table which we can easily merge with the parent article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This used to also be referenced from Languages of the United States which is a fine place to include the information. It was removed here without comment. There was some discussion mentioning the template long before its removal. -- ke4roh (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. I put the table back in Languages of the United States. -- ke4roh (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Substitute this as being content for articles. This is not appropriate use of template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose one article could refer to the other for the table, but I would hate to see the information duplicated in both places. -- ke4roh (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Now that this table is being used in more than one article, keeping it as a template will allow the table to be updated on each article by updating the template, rather than having to manually update the table on each article, which would be more tedious and could also lead to inconsistencies at times. --Zander251 (talk) 01:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, used in more than one article. Erinius (talk) 08:58, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as per Zander251 & Erinius BSMIsEditing (talk) 18:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Singaporean name
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Grundorf modules
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused ((Adjacent stations)) modules and no obvious place to use them. Mackensen (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Category scope
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Had only one transclusion at Category:Sport by region which I've replaced with a ((Hatnote)) call. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the template is used, just not every day. I used it recently, and the issue was resolved. It worked as intended. If it could have a ((possibly empty category)) on it, like the category it populates, it would. --awkwafaba (📥) 03:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Should it be a ((Possibly unused template))? Certes (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, since it is used as a short-term cleanup template. I have tagged it with ((transclusionless)), which is the proper way to process a template like this so that it does not appear on unused template reports. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - the template is currently used on four pages, and has the ((transclusionless)) template added. --awkwafaba (📥) 15:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the template is occasionally used to flag problems in taxoboxes. Not used frequently, but certainly not unused. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Template category may be empty most of the time, but is still required to notify taxobox editors of articles needing attention. Loopy30 (talk) 01:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep since it's been used as of now. It is relevant. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Constituencies of Corse-du-Sud
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused, only has two links and fails WP:NENAN anyway Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:52, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it can be renamed to Template:Constituencies and departments of Corsica, and add the two constituencies for Haute-Corse - 1 and 2; thus it would have 7 links, 4 constituencies and 2 departments and the French administrative region island of Corsica -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Archive top yellow/old
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unused __ Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge history of Template:Archive top yellow/old and Template:Archive top yellow: Seems like the creation of this was botched. This was created because @MJL: moved Template:Archive top yellow to Template:Archive top yellow/old and then moved something from his userspace to Template:Archive top yellow/old. That's not how it should have been done; MJL should have instead edited Template:Archive top yellow. pbp 02:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: History merged. I am interested in opinions on what to do with the template now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:41, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the history has been merged. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Year in country category/old
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No longer in use. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be histmerged with Template:Year in country category instead of deleted. Fram (talk) 08:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've taken care of the hist merge and would like opinions on what to do with the template now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the history has been merged. Gonnym (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Hungary squad 1958 World Men's Handball Championship
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).